ReviewAnnals of botany2017
Evolution and ecology of plant architecture: integrating insights from the fossil record, extant morphology, developmental genetics and phylogenies.
Review in Annals of botany, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inflorescence architecture and development in the megadiverseAoB PLANTS · 2026Article
- Branching hierarchy shapes branch-leaf allometry and trait coordination in mountain shrubs of Dongling Mountain, Beijing.AoB PLANTS · 2026Article
- Resolving the Stasis-Dynamism Paradox: Genome Evolution in Tree Ferns.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Comparative transcriptomics in ferns reveals key innovations and divergent evolution of the secondary cell walls.Nature plants · 2025Article
- Evolution of theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- The role of fossils for reconstructing the evolution of plant development.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024Article
- Exploring the mechanical and morphological rationality of tree branch structure based on 3D point cloud analysis and the finite element method.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Identifying Developmental Patterns in Structured Plant Phenotyping Data.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- An evidence-based 3D reconstruction ofeLife · 2021Article
- Unusual developmental morphology and anatomy of vegetative organs in Utricularia dichotoma-leaf, shoot and root dynamics.Protoplasma · 2020Article
- Plant Origin, but Not Phylogeny, Drive Species Ecophysiological Response to Projected Climate.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Comparative proteomic analysis provides new insights into the specialization of shoots and stolons in bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L.).BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Network trade-offs and homeostasis in Arabidopsis shoot architectures.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Climate and symbioses with ants modulate leaf/stem scaling in epiphytes.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- The relative weight of ontogeny, topology and climate in the architectural development of three North American conifers.AoB PLANTS · 2018Article
- Evolution of Plant Architecture, Functional Diversification and Divergent Evolution in the GenusFrontiers in plant science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn contrast to most animals, plants have an indeterminate body plan, which allows them to add new body parts during their lifetime. A plant's realized modular construction is the result of exogenous constraints and endogenous processes. This review focuses on endogenous processes that shape plant architectures and their evolution. SCOPE: The phylogenetic distribution of plant growth forms across the phylogeny implies that body architectures have originated and been lost repeatedly, being shaped by a limited set of genetic pathways. We (1) synthesize concepts of plant architecture, so far captured in 23 models; (2) extend them to the fossil record; (3) summarize what is known about their developmental genetics; (4) use a phylogenetic approach in several groups to infer how plant architecture has changed and by which intermediate steps; and (5) discuss which macroecological factors may constrain the geographic and ecological distribution of plant architectures.
conclusionsDichotomously branching Paleozoic plants already encompassed a considerable diversity of growth forms, here captured in 12 new architectural models. Plotting the frequency of branching types through time based on an analysis of 58 927 land plant fossils revealed a decrease in dichotomous branching throughout the Devonian and Carboniferous, mirrored by an increase in other branching types including axillary branching. We suggest that the evolution of seed plant megaphyllous leaves enabling axillary branching contributed to the demise of dichotomous architectures. The developmental-genetic bases for key architectural traits underlying sympodial vs. monopodial branching, rhythmic vs. continuous growth, and axillary branching and its localization are becoming well understood, while the molecular basis of dichotomous branching and plagiotropy remains elusive. Three phylogenetic case studies of architecture evolution in conifers, Aloe and monocaulous arborescent vascular plants reveal relationships between architectural models and show that some are labile in given groups, whereas others are widely conserved, apparently shaped by ecological factors, such as intercepted sunlight, temperature, humidity and seasonality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.