Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29165360›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2017

Dynamic Docking: A Paradigm Shift in Computational Drug Discovery.

Dario Gioia, Martina Bertazzo, Maurizio Recanatini, Matteo Masetti, Andrea Cavalli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mutation-Induced Resistance of SARS-CoV-2 MInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Interaction of major monoterpenes fromFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. On Free Energy Calculations in Drug Discovery.Accounts of chemical research · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dario GioiaDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, Alma Mater Studiorum-Universita' di Bologna, via Belmeloro 6, I-40126 Bologna, Italy. dario.gioia2@unibo.it.
Martina BertazzoDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, Alma Mater Studiorum-Universita' di Bologna, via Belmeloro 6, I-40126 Bologna, Italy. martina.bertazzo2@unibo.it.
Maurizio RecanatiniDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, Alma Mater Studiorum-Universita' di Bologna, via Belmeloro 6, I-40126 Bologna, Italy. maurizio.recanatini@unibo.it.
Matteo MasettiDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, Alma Mater Studiorum-Universita' di Bologna, via Belmeloro 6, I-40126 Bologna, Italy. matteo.masetti4@unibo.it.ORCID 0000-0002-3757-7802
Andrea CavalliDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, Alma Mater Studiorum-Universita' di Bologna, via Belmeloro 6, I-40126 Bologna, Italy. andrea.cavalli@iit.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular docking is the methodology of choice for studying in silico protein-ligand binding and for prioritizing compounds to discover new lead candidates. Traditional docking simulations suffer from major limitations, mostly related to the static or semi-flexible treatment of ligands and targets. They also neglect solvation and entropic effects, which strongly limits their predictive power. During the last decade, methods based on full atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) have emerged as a valid alternative for simulating macromolecular complexes. In principle, compared to traditional docking, MD allows the full exploration of drug-target recognition and binding from both the mechanistic and energetic points of view (dynamic docking). Binding and unbinding kinetic constants can also be determined. While dynamic docking is still too computationally expensive to be routinely used in fast-paced drug discovery programs, the advent of faster computing architectures and advanced simulation methodologies are changing this scenario. It is feasible that dynamic docking will replace static docking approaches in the near future, leading to a major paradigm shift in in silico drug discovery. Against this background, we review the key achievements that have paved the way for this progress.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDrug DiscoveryMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationAlgorithmsLigandsModels, MolecularProtein BindingProteinsLigandsProteinsbinding kineticsdrug discoveryenhanced samplingmolecular dynamicsprotein-ligand binding

Identifiers

PMID29165360
PMCPMC6150405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.