Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29165227›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2018

Reflections on a Community Engagement Strategy for Mass Antimalarial Drug Administration in Cambodia.

Thomas J Peto, Rupam Tripura, Chan Davoeung, Chea Nguon, Sanann Nou, Chhouen Heng, Pich Kunthea, Bipin Adhikari, Renly Lim, Nicola James and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Community engagement and ethical global health research.Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Thomas J PetoCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rupam TripuraDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Chan DavoeungDepartment of Provincial Health, Battambang, Cambodia.
Chea NguonNational Center for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sanann NouMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chhouen HengMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pich KuntheaMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Bipin AdhikariCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Renly LimSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Nicola JamesFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Christopher PellCentre for Social Science and Global Health, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Phaik Yeong CheahCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit · THMahidol University · THUniversity of Oxford · GBAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development · NLCambodia National Malaria Center · KHLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Battambang · KHUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

Wellcome Trust 101148/Z/13/ Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass drug administration (MDA) to interrupt malaria transmission requires the participation of entire communities. As part of a clinical trial in western Cambodia, four villages received MDA in 2015-2016. Before approaching study communities, a collaboration was established with the local health authorities, village leaders, and village malaria workers. Formative research guided the development of engagement strategies. In each village, a team of volunteers was formed to explain MDA to their neighbors and provide support during implementation. Public mobilization events featuring drama and music were used to introduce MDA. Villages comprised groups with different levels of understanding and interests; therefore, multiple tailored engagement strategies were required. The main challenges were explaining malaria transmission, managing perceptions of drug side effects, and reaching mobile populations. It was important that local leaders took a central role in community engagement. Coverage during each round of MDA averaged 84%, which met the target for the trial.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationAntimalarialsCambodiaCommunity-Institutional RelationsHumansMalariaMass Drug AdministrationProgram DevelopmentAntimalarials

Identifiers

PMID29165227
PMCPMC5928715
OpenAlexW2770011724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.