Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29164743›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2018

Patient-initiated recruitment for clinical research: Evaluation of an outpatient letter research statement.

Matthias Wienroth, Louise Caffrey, Charles Wolfe, Christopher McKevitt

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. JITA: A Platform for Enabling Real Time Point-of-Care Patient Recruitment.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
  4. Patient-initiated recruitment for clinical research: Evaluation of an outpatient letter research statement.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthias WienrothSchool of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Guy's Campus, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9722-3918
Louise CaffreySchool of Social Work and Social Policy, College Green, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Charles WolfeSchool of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Guy's Campus, London, UK.
Christopher McKevittSchool of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Guy's Campus, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5290-4613

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUK Hospital Trusts are charged with increasing patients' research awareness and willingness to take part in research. This includes implementing strategies to encourage patient-initiated enquiries about participation.

objectivesTo evaluate the impact of a research statement inserted in outpatient letters in one clinical service, and to derive suggestions on potential steps towards increasing patient-initiated recruitment.

settingA medical outpatient clinic of a research-active hospital trust, serving an inner-city multi-ethnic population across two boroughs.

methodsPre-intervention and post-intervention questionnaires were administered face-to-face to new patients. Questionnaires included closed questions and one open comments section. Data were analysed for frequencies, with thematic coding of open-ended responses.

resultsThe response rates were 87% for the pre-intervention survey and 92% for the post-intervention survey. In the post-intervention survey, 85% of patients did not notice the research statement in the letter. More than half found the statement "a little unclear," whilst one-third considered it "clear." Three-quarters of respondents perceived the statement to be "a little helpful." Only one person enquired about participating in clinical research having read the statement in the outpatient letter.

conclusionThe analysis suggests that simple, single-solution approaches such as including research statements in outpatient letters are unlikely to be sufficient to significantly facilitate patient-initiated recruitment. Recruitment efforts need to take into consideration the diversity of patient constituencies including the reasons they seek health care, and how patients can meaningfully access information (research literacy).

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthCorrespondence as TopicPatient SelectionAcademic Medical CentersCitiesHumansOrganizational Case StudiesOutpatientsResearchResearch SubjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomclinical researchpatient recruitmentresearch literacy

Identifiers

PMID29164743
PMCPMC5867329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.