ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2019
Betel Quid Use and Oral Cancer in a High-Risk Refugee Community in the USA: The Effectiveness of an Awareness Initiative.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions to Improve Health Among Refugees in the United States: A Systematic Review.Journal of community health · 2025Pooled it
- Knowledge, attitudes and practices of South Asian immigrants in developed countries regarding oral cancer: an integrative review.BMC cancer · 2020Pooled it
- A Review of Intervention Strategies for Areca Nut Use Cessation.Indian journal of psychological medicine · 2023Review
- The impact of culture on new Asian immigrants' access to oral health care: a scoping review.Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD · 2023Article
- Evidence of areca nut consumption in the United States mainland: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Analysis of risk factors for multiple primary oral squamous cell carcinoma: a cohort study.Clinical oral investigations · 2020Article
- Peri-implant clinicoradiographic status among betel-quid chewers and controls.Brazilian dental journalObservational
- Instruments to Measure Betel Quid Dependency among Young and Adult Chewers - A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.Contemporary clinical dentistryArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Betel nut (BN) is a psychoactive oral carcinogen that is commonly used among Asian communities. This study aims to investigate BN usage patterns and the effectiveness of a visually guided educational initiative in a high-risk refugee population. All adult patients presenting to a private practice clinic, free community clinic, or health fair in the refugee community of Clarkston, Georgia during days when survey staff were present were approached for the study. Participants were first categorized into a familiar and unfamiliar cohort depending on participant-reported familiarity with BN. Depending on familiarity, subjects were then administered a pre-intervention test surveying health awareness for BN and usage patterns where relevant; subsequently, a visually guided educational brochure was reviewed, and a post-intervention test was administered. Results were statistically analyzed (STATA 12). Forty-eight participants were surveyed for the familiar cohort and 25 for the unfamiliar cohort. Among the familiar cohort, South and Southeast Asians comprised 91% of participants. On frequency of use, 42.8% reported social, 28.6% reported usage during celebrations only, and 28.6% reported daily. The most common reasons for use were for taste (40.9%), enjoyment (38.6%), and addiction (25%). Among the familiar cohort, 75% believed BN was harmful for health compared to 8% among the unfamiliar (p < 0.0001). In the familiar cohort, 52.3% believed BN alone could cause cancer compared to 4% among the unfamiliar (p < 0.0001). Following the educational intervention, 100% of participants believed BN mastication is harmful in both cohorts (p < 0.01), while 87.5% of participants in both cohorts recognized that BN alone could cause cancer (p < 0.0007). This study illustrates gaps in understanding regarding oral cancer and the health consequences of chronic BN mastication, as well as the efficacy of a visually guided educational brochure to improve participant knowledge among a high-risk refugee population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.