Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29164486›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2018

Adaptation and Probiotic Potential of Lactobacilli, Isolated from the Oral Cavity and Intestines of Healthy People.

Yulia Chervinets, Vyacheslav Chervinets, Boris Shenderov, Ekaterina Belyaeva, Andrey Troshin, Sergey Lebedev, Valery Danilenko

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Phenotypic Traits and Probiotic Functions ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  3. Comparison and selection of probioticFood science & nutrition · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yulia ChervinetsDepartment of Microbiology and Virusology with Immunology course, Tver State Medical University, Tver, Russia. julia_chervinec@mail.ru.
Vyacheslav ChervinetsDepartment of Microbiology and Virusology with Immunology course, Tver State Medical University, Tver, Russia.
Boris ShenderovLaboratory of Biology of Bifidobacteria, Moscow Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology named by G. N. Gabrichevsky, Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina BelyaevaDepartment of Microbiology and Virusology with Immunology course, Tver State Medical University, Tver, Russia.
Andrey TroshinDepartment of Microbiology and Virusology with Immunology course, Tver State Medical University, Tver, Russia.
Sergey LebedevDepartment of Microbiology and Virusology with Immunology course, Tver State Medical University, Tver, Russia.
Valery DanilenkoLaboratory of Genetics of Microorganisms, Institute of General Genetics named by N. I. Vavilov of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Tver State Medical University · RUGabrichevsky Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology · RUVavilov Institute of General Genetics · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study shows that, from 300 Lactobacillus strains isolated from the oral cavity and large intestine of 600 healthy people, only 9 had high antagonistic activity against pathogens and opportunistic pathogens. All antagonistic strains of lactobacilli have been identified by 16S rRNA sequencing and assigned to four species: Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus plantarum, and Lactobacillus casei. In addition, these lactobacilli appeared to be nonpathogenic and had some probiotic potential: the strains produced lactic acid and bacteriocins, showed high sensitivity to broad-spectrum antibiotics, and were capable of forming biofilms in vitro. With the help of PCR and specific primers, the presence of genes for prebacteriocins in L. plantarum (plnEF, plnJ, plnN) and L. rhamnosus (LGG_02380 and LGG_02400) has been revealed. It was found that intestinal strains of lactobacilli were resistant to hydrochloric acid and bile. Lactobacilli isolated from the oral cavity were characterized by a high degree of adhesion, whereas intestinal strains were characterized by average adhesion. Both types of lactobacilli had medium to high rates of auto-aggregation and hydrophobicity and could coaggregate with pathogens and opportunistic pathogens. Additionally, the ability of the lactobacilli strains to produce gasotransmitters, CH

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAdolescentAdultBacterial ProteinsBiofilmsChildFemaleHumansIntestinesLactobacillusMaleMouthProbioticsYoung AdultBacterial ProteinsAcid productionAdhesionGasotransmittersLactobacilliOral cavityPersistence

Identifiers

PMID29164486
OpenAlexW2770839073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.