ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2018
Individual trajectories of cognitive performance in first episode psychosis: a 2-year follow-up study.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of early intervention for first episode psychosis on cognitive functioning.Schizophrenia research · 2023Trial
- Cognitive impairment across the schizophrenia spectrum: a comparative neuropsychological study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Elevated Extracellular Free Water in the Brain Predicts Clinical Improvement in First-Episode Psychosis.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2025Article
- The role of cognitive reserve and clinical symptoms in the association between genetic liability for educational attainment and functioning in first-episode psychosis: A mediation analysis.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2024Article
- Neurocognitive Deficits in First-Episode and Chronic Psychotic Disorders: A Systematic Review from 2009 to 2022.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- The age of onset and cognitive impairment at the early stage of schizophrenia.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2023Article
- Logistic versus linear regression-based reliable change index: A simulation study with implications for clinical studies with different sample sizes.Psychological assessment · 2022Article
- Verbal memory measurement towards digital perspectives in first-episode psychosis: A review.Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2020Review
- Neurocognition and Social Cognition Predicting 1-Year Outcomes in First-Episode Psychosis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
- Long-term cognitive trajectories and heterogeneity in patients with schizophrenia and their unaffected siblings.Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2018Article
- Cognitive Deficits in Psychotic Disorders: A Lifespan Perspective.Neuropsychology review · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individual changes over time in cognition in patients with psychotic disorders have been studied very little, especially in the case of first episode psychosis (FEP). We aimed to establish whether change in individual trajectories in cognition over 2 years of a sample of 159 FEP patients was reliable and clinically significant, using the reliable change index (RCI) and clinically significant change (CSC) methods. We also studied a sample of 151 matched healthy controls. Patients and controls were assessed with a set of neuropsychological tests, as well as premorbid, clinical and functionality measures. We analysed the course of cognitive measures over time, using analysis of variance, and the individual trajectories in the cognitive measures with the regression-based RCI (RCI
Indexed as
Identifiers
29164332What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.