Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29164312›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neurology2018

Efficacy and safety of rotigotine in elderly patients with Parkinson's disease in comparison with the non-elderly: a post hoc analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.

Masahiro Nomoto, Hirotaka Iwaki, Hiroyuki Kondo, Masaya Sakurai

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A meta-analysis evaluating effects of the rotigotine in Parkinson's disease, focusing on sleep disturbances and activities of daily living.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. The Treatment of Older Patients with Parkinson's Disease.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Masahiro NomotoDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Pharmacology, Ehime University Hospital, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, Japan. nomoto@m.ehime-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2981-1013
Hirotaka IwakiDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Pharmacology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, Japan.
Hiroyuki KondoDepartment of Medical Affairs, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaya SakuraiDepartment of Medical Affairs, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Otsuka (Japan) · JPEhime University · JPEhime University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rotigotine-a non-ergot dopamine agonist-has two advantages; it can stimulate all dopamine receptors (D1-D5) like innate dopamine, and its transdermal administration provides continuous dopaminergic stimulation. The age of the patient impacts the effect and adverse events of anti-parkinsonian treatment. We conducted a post hoc analysis on three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials performed in Japan to clarify the difference of anti-parkinsonian treatment in elderly and non-elderly patients. Data from two combination therapy trials (with levodopa) in advanced stage Parkinson's disease patients and one monotherapy trial in early stage patients were pooled and grouped by age (non-elderly aged < 70, elderly aged 70 +). In each age group, efficacy of rotigotine was compared to placebo. In the combination therapy, total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III scores and some subtotal scores, including those for tremor, akinesia and gait disturbance, significantly improved in both elderly and non-elderly patients. Regarding safety, the incidence of total adverse event tended to be lower in elderly patients than non-elderly patients, although it was not significant. No difference was observed in maintenance dosage of rotigotine between the two groups. In conclusion, the improvement in motor symptoms and frequency of adverse events were shown to be similar in elderly and non-elderly patients with rotigotine-levodopa combination therapy. Further, there was no major difference in maintenance dosage of rotigotine between the age groups. These results suggest good tolerability of rotigotine among elderly patients.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsAntiparkinson AgentsDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansLevodopaMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareParkinson DiseaseSeverity of Illness IndexTetrahydronaphthalenesThiophenesAntiparkinson AgentsLevodoparotigotineTetrahydronaphthalenesThiophenesEfficacyElderly patientsParkinson’s diseasePost hoc analysisRotigotineSafety

Identifiers

PMID29164312
PMCPMC5808069
OpenAlexW2768636210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.