ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2017
Determining the Most Important Factors Involved in Ranking Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Applicants.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing match outcomes of international medical graduates (IMGs), U.S. allopathic (MDs), and osteopathic graduates (DOs) into orthopaedic spine surgery fellowship programs from 2019-2024.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- Evaluating Research Productivity Trends Among Orthopaedic Adult Reconstruction Fellowship Applicants: A Bibliometric Study.Arthroplasty today · 2025Article
- Success in the Sports Medicine Fellowship Match: The Role of Research Productivity and Academic Metrics.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Recurring low statistical robustness in orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review of 84 fragility index studies.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Analysis of the 2024 Breast Surgical Oncology Fellowship Match: Survey of Applicants' and Program Directors' Preferences Regarding In-Person Versus Virtual Interviews.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Knee Fellowships Improve Clinical Practice and Scientific Activity.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Publication Rates of Podium Presentations at an Annual Orthopedic Surgery Resident and Fellow Research Symposium.Cureus · 2024Article
- Virtual Interviews Are Not Adequate Replacements for In-Person Interviews for Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Program Directors and Applicants.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- The COVID-19 Pandemic Increased the Use of Virtual Fellowship Interviews, Reduced Case Volume, and Limited Sideline Coverage Opportunities During Sports Medicine Surgeon Training.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Are Orthopedic Fellowship Programs Giving Out Too Many Interviews? A Retrospective Analysis Suggests They Are.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2023Article
- The Top 10 Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Programs in the United States Frequently Select Fellowship Applicants From the Same Residency Programs.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Program and Faculty Reputation Are Valued Most by Applicants to Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowships.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Orthopaedic Shoulder and Elbow Fellowship Directors in the United States Have Substantial Research Output but Lack Diversity.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Factors Influencing Sports Medicine as a Career Choice Among Orthopaedic Trainees in Saudi Arabia.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2022Article
- Relative Importance of Applicant Characteristics in Ophthalmology Residency Interview Selection: A Survey of Program Directors.Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017) · 2022Article
- Investigation of Fellowship Leadership in Orthopaedic Musculoskeletal Oncology.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2022Article
- Virtual Interviews for Sports Medicine Fellowship Positions Save Time and Money but Don't Replace In-Person Meetings.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- The Effect of Changing Fellowship Interview Format on Candidate Ranking Variabilities: The COVID-19 Experience.Journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrthopaedic surgery residencies and certain fellowships are becoming increasingly competitive. Several studies have identified important factors to be taken into account when selecting medical students for residency interviews. Similar information for selecting orthopaedic sports medicine fellows does not exist. PURPOSE: To determine the most important factors that orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship program directors (PDs) take into account when ranking applicants. STUDY
designCross-sectional study.
methodsA brief survey was distributed electronically to PDs of the 92 orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship programs that are accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Each PD was asked to rank, in order, the 5 most important factors taken into account when ranking applicants based on a total list of 13 factors: the interview, the applicant's residency program, letters of recommendation (LORs), personal connections made through the applicant, research experience, an applicant's geographical ties to the city/town of the fellowship program, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores, Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) scores, history of being a competitive athlete in college, extracurricular activities/hobbies, volunteer experience, interest in a career in academics, and publications/research/posters. Factors were scored from 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the most important factor and 1 representing the fifth-most important factor.
resultsOf the 92 PDs contacted, 57 (62%) responded. Thirty-four PDs (37%) listed the interview as the most important factor in ranking fellowship applicants (overall score, 233). LORs (overall score, 196), an applicant's residency program (overall score, 133), publications/research/posters (overall score, 115), and personal connections (overall score, 90) were reported as the second- through fifth-most important factors, respectively.
conclusionAccording to orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship PDs, the fellowship interview is the most important factor in determining how an applicant will be ranked. Other factors, including LORs, the applicant's residency program, research production, and personal connections, were also considered to be important. This information provides orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship applicants with a better understanding of which areas to focus on when preparing for the fellowship interview and matching process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.