ReviewFrontiers in oncology2017
Prostate Cancer Imaging and Biomarkers Guiding Safe Selection of Active Surveillance.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Active Surveillance in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Review of the Current Data.Cancers · 2022Review
- Active surveillance in prostate cancer management: where do we stand now?Archives of medical science : AMS · 2021Article
- The Movember Prostate Cancer Landscape Analysis: an assessment of unmet research needs.Nature reviews. Urology · 2020Review
- Comparison of biparametric MRI to full multiparametric MRI for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2019Article
- Liquid Biopsy in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer-A Biologist's Point of View.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Review
- MRI findings guiding selection of active surveillance for prostate cancer: a review of emerging evidence.Translational andrology and urology · 2018Review
- Magnetic resonance imaging in active surveillance-a modern approach.Translational andrology and urology · 2018Review
- MALAT1 silencing suppresses prostate cancer progression by upregulating miR-1 and downregulating KRAS.OncoTargets and therapy · 2018Article
- Multiparametric MRIIn vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
- Integration of magnetic resonance imaging into prostate cancer nomograms.Therapeutic advances in urologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundActive surveillance (AS) is a widely adopted strategy to monitor men with low-risk, localized prostate cancer (PCa). Current AS inclusion criteria may misclassify as many as one in four patients. The advent of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and novel PCa biomarkers may offer improved risk stratification. We performed a review of recently published literature to characterize emerging evidence in support of these novel modalities.
methodsAn English literature search was conducted on PubMed for available original investigations on localized PCa, AS, imaging, and biomarkers published within the past 3 years. Our Boolean criteria included the following terms: PCa, AS, imaging, biomarker, genetic, genomic, prospective, retrospective, and comparative. The bibliographies and diagnostic modalities of the identified studies were used to expand our search.
resultsOur review identified 222 original studies. Our expanded search yielded 244 studies. Among these, 70 met our inclusion criteria. Evidence suggests mpMRI offers improved detection of clinically significant PCa, and MRI-fusion technology enhances the sensitivity of surveillance biopsies. Multiple studies demonstrate the promise of commercially available screening assays for prediction of AS failure, and several novel biomarkers show promise in this setting.
conclusionIn the era of AS for men with low-risk PCa, improved strategies for proper stratification are needed. mpMRI has dramatically enhanced the detection of clinically significant PCa. The advent of novel biomarkers for prediction of aggressive disease and AS failure has shown some initial promise, but further validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.