ReviewGlobal spine journal2017
Timing of Decompression in Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.
Review in Global spine journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
69 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 164 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tracing the evolving dynamics and research hotspots of spinal cord injury and surgical decompression from 1975 to 2024: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Time-sensitive ambulatory orthopaedic soft-tissue surgery paradigms during the COVID-19 pandemic.International orthopaedics · 2020Pooled it
- Letter to the Editor: Surgical Timing and Neurological Outcomes in Traumatic Central Cord Syndrome: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Spinal cord stimulation: An emerging strategy for chronic pain relief after spinal cord injury.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Breaking the cycle of excitotoxicity: blood glutamate scavenging provides robust neuroprotection in spinal cord injury.Inflammation and regeneration · 2026Article
- MSC-derived extracellular vesicles for spinal cord injury: inflammatory microenvironment modulation, stage-dependent repair mechanisms, and translational challenges.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Review
- Combining Therapeutic Strategies to Treat the Injured Spinal Cord: A Translational Perspective.Journal of neurotrauma · 2025Review
- Early versus Delayed Surgical Decompression in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2025Review
- Time trends in spine surgery in Italy: a nationwide, population-based study of 1,560,969 records of administrative health data from 2001 to 2019.Acta orthopaedica · 2025Article
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes: A Promising Therapeutic Strategy for Spinal Cord Injury.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- PILOT STUDY OF COMBINED TRANSVERTEBRAL MAGNETIC AND TRANSCUTANEOUS STIMULATION FOR THE REHABILITATION OF COMBAT ACUTE SPINAL CORD INJURIES.Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications · 2025Article
- Traumatic central cord Syndrome: An integrated neurosurgical and neurocritical care perspective.Brain & spine · 2025Review
- Clickable Granular Hydrogel Scaffolds for Delivery of Neural Progenitor Cells to Sites of Spinal Cord Injury.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Article
- Outcome and complications of operatively treated subaxial cervical spine injuries: A population-based retrospective cohort study.World neurosurgery: X · 2024Article
- Role of durotomy on function outcome, tissue sparing, inflammation, and tissue stiffness after spinal cord injury in rats.MedComm · 2024Article
- Article
- Timing of Decompressive Surgery in Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: Systematic Review Update.Global spine journal · 2024Article
- An Update of a Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: Recommendations on the Role and Timing of Decompressive Surgery.Global spine journal · 2024Article
- Ultra-Early (<5 Hours) Decompression for Thoracolumbar Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Series.Cureus · 2024Article
9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designSystematic review.
objectiveTo conduct a systematic review and synthesis of the literature to assess the comparative effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of early (≤24 hours) versus late decompression (>24 hours) in adults with acute spinal cord injury (SCI).
methodsA systematic search was conducted of Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration Library, and Google Scholar to identify studies published through November 6, 2014. Studies published in any language, in humans, and with an abstract were considered for inclusion. Included studies were critically appraised and the overall strength of evidence was determined using methods proposed by the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group.
resultsThe search yielded 449 potentially relevant citations. Sixteen additional primary studies were identified through other sources. Six studies met inclusion criteria. All but 2 studies were considered to have moderately high risk of bias. Across studies and injury levels, the impact of early surgical decompression (≤24 hours) on clinically important improvement in neurological status was variable. Isolated studies reported statistically significant and clinically important improvements at 6 months (cervical injury, low strength of evidence) and following discharge from inpatient rehabilitation (all levels, very low strength of evidence) but not at other time points; another study observed a statistically significant 6 point improvement in ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) among patients with AIS B, C, or D, but not for those with AIS A (very low strength of evidence). In one study of acute central cord syndrome without instability, a clinically and statistically meaningful improvement in total motor scores was reported at 6 and 12 months in patients treated early (versus late). There were, however, no significant differences in AIS improvement between early and late surgical groups at 6- or 12-months (very low strength of evidence). One of 3 studies found a shorter length of hospital stay associated with early surgical decompression. Of 3 studies reporting on safety, no significant differences in rates of complications (including mortality, neurologic deterioration, pneumonia or pressure ulcers) were noted between early and late decompression groups.
conclusionsResults surrounding the efficacy of early versus late decompressive surgery, as well as the quality of evidence available, were variable depending on the level of SCI, timing of follow-up, and specific outcome considered. Existing evidence supports improved neurological recovery among cervical SCI patients undergoing early surgery; however, evidence regarding remaining SCI populations and clinical outcomes was inconsistent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.