Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29163666›Full record

ArticleConflict and health2017

Addressing culture and context in humanitarian response: preparing desk reviews to inform mental health and psychosocial support.

M Claire Greene, Mark J D Jordans, Brandon A Kohrt, Peter Ventevogel, Laurence J Kirmayer, Ghayda Hassan, Anna Chiumento, Mark van Ommeren, Wietse A Tol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conflict and health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Culture and mental health in Nepal: an interdisciplinary scoping review.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

M Claire GreeneDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 North Broadway Rm. 888, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA.
Mark J D JordansResearch & Development Department, War Child Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Brandon A KohrtDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC USA.
Peter VentevogelPublic Health Section, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva, Switzerland.
Laurence J KirmayerDivision of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, QC Canada.
Ghayda HassanDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC Canada.
Anna ChiumentoInstitute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Mark van OmmerenDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Wietse A TolDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 North Broadway Rm. 888, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA.

Funding

NIDA Epidemiology Training Program: Johns Hopkins UniversityT32DA007292 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RENEE M. JOHNSON, Brion S Maher · 1993 to 2026
$17.7M
Reducing Barriers to Mental Health Task SharingK01MH104310 · NIMH · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KOHRT, BRANDON ALAN · 2014 to 2018
$908k
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007292NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH104310World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delivery of effective mental health and psychosocial support programs requires knowledge of existing health systems and socio-cultural context. To respond rapidly to humanitarian emergencies, international organizations often seek to design programs according to international guidelines and mobilize external human resources to manage and deliver programs. Familiarizing international humanitarian practitioners with local culture and contextualizing programs is essential to minimize risk of harm, maximize benefit, and optimize efficient use of resources. Timely literature reviews on traditional health practices, cultural beliefs and attitudes toward mental health and illness, local health care systems and previous experiences with humanitarian interventions can provide international practitioners with crucial background information to improve their capacity to work efficiently and with maximum benefit. In this paper, we draw on experience implementing desk review guidance from the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNHCR, the United Nations Refugee Agency (2012) in four diverse humanitarian crises (earthquakes in Haiti and Nepal; forced displacement among Syrians and Congolese). We discuss critical parameters for the design and implementation of desk reviews, and discuss current challenges and future directions to improve mental health care and psychosocial support in humanitarian emergencies.

Indexed as

ContextCultureDesk reviewEmergencyHumanitarianMental healthPsychosocial

Identifiers

PMID29163666
PMCPMC5686886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.