Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29163623›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2017

Accession-Dependent

Sungkyung Cho, Si-In Yu, Junghoon Park, Yanfei Mao, Jian-Kang Zhu, Dae-Jin Yun, Byeong-Ha Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Epigenetic switch from repressive to permissive chromatin in response to cold stress.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sungkyung ChoDepartment of Life Science, Sogang University, Seoul, South Korea.
Si-In YuDepartment of Life Science, Sogang University, Seoul, South Korea.
Junghoon ParkDepartment of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea.
Yanfei MaoShanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology and Center of Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Jian-Kang ZhuShanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology and Center of Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Dae-Jin YunDepartment of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea.
Byeong-Ha LeeDepartment of Life Science, Sogang University, Seoul, South Korea.
Sogang University · KRKonkuk University · KRCenter for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CRISPR/Cas system became a powerful genome editing tool for basic plant research and crop improvement. Thus far, CRISPR/Cas has been applied to many plants, including Arabidopsis, rice and other crop plants. It has been reported that CRISPR/Cas efficiency is generally high in many plants. In this study, we compared the genome editing efficiency of CRISPR/Cas in three different Arabidopsis accessions [Col-0, Ler, and C24RDLUC (C24 accession harboring the stress-responsive RD29A promoter-driven luciferase reporter)]. For the comparison, we chose to target the cold-responsive

Indexed as

accessionsCasCBFcold signalingcold stressCRISPR

Identifiers

PMID29163623
PMCPMC5682037
OpenAlexW2767879734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.