Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29163562›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2017

Combined Field Inoculations of

Nicola Imperiali, Xavier Chiriboga, Klaus Schlaeppi, Marie Fesselet, Daniela Villacrés, Geoffrey Jaffuel, S Franz Bender, Francesca Dennert, Ruben Blanco-Pérez, Marcel G A van der Heijden and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Activity ofJournal of nematology · 2020
    Article
  13. Antagonistic Activity of Chilean Strains ofFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Nicola ImperialiDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Xavier ChiribogaFARCE Laboratory, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Klaus SchlaeppiPlant-Soil-Interactions, Department of Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope Reckenholz, Zurich, Switzerland.
Marie FesseletPlant Breeding and Genetic Resources, Institute for Plant Production Sciences, Agroscope Changins, Nyon, Switzerland.
Daniela VillacrésPlant Breeding and Genetic Resources, Institute for Plant Production Sciences, Agroscope Changins, Nyon, Switzerland.
Geoffrey JaffuelFARCE Laboratory, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
S Franz BenderPlant-Soil-Interactions, Department of Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope Reckenholz, Zurich, Switzerland.
Francesca DennertInstitute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ruben Blanco-PérezFARCE Laboratory, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Marcel G A van der HeijdenPlant-Soil-Interactions, Department of Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope Reckenholz, Zurich, Switzerland.
Monika MaurhoferInstitute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Fabio MascherPlant Breeding and Genetic Resources, Institute for Plant Production Sciences, Agroscope Changins, Nyon, Switzerland.
Ted C J TurlingsFARCE Laboratory, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Christoph J KeelDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Raquel Campos-HerreraFARCE Laboratory, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Agroscope · CHUniversity of Neuchâtel · CHETH Zurich · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Algarve · PTUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In agricultural ecosystems, pest insects, pathogens, and reduced soil fertility pose major challenges to crop productivity and are responsible for significant yield losses worldwide. Management of belowground pests and diseases remains particularly challenging due to the complex nature of the soil and the limited reach of conventional agrochemicals. Boosting the presence of beneficial rhizosphere organisms is a potentially sustainable alternative and may help to optimize crop health and productivity. Field application of single beneficial soil organisms has shown satisfactory results under optimal conditions. This might be further enhanced by combining multiple beneficial soil organisms, but this remains poorly investigated. Here, we inoculated wheat plots with combinations of three beneficial soil organisms that have different rhizosphere functions and studied their effects on crop performance. Plant beneficial

Indexed as

biofertilizerbiological controlHeterorhabditisinsect pestplant-growth promoting rhizobacteriaplant growth promotionSteinernemawheat

Identifiers

PMID29163562
PMCPMC5671467
OpenAlexW2766689780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.