Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29163377›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2017

Wild Grape-Associated Yeasts as Promising Biocontrol Agents against

Gustavo Cordero-Bueso, Nicola Mangieri, David Maghradze, Roberto Foschino, Federica Valdetara, Jesús M Cantoral, Ileana Vigentini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Yeast to the rescue:Plant signaling & behavior · 2025
    Article
  8. Improvement of Biocontrol Efficiency ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Use of Specific Non-Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. TheFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. An Overview ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gustavo Cordero-BuesoDepartment of Biomedicine, Biotechnology and Public Health, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.
Nicola MangieriDepartment of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
David MaghradzeDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, Institute of Horticulture, Viticulture and Oenology, Agricultural University of Georgia, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Roberto FoschinoDepartment of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Federica ValdetaraDepartment of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Jesús M CantoralDepartment of Biomedicine, Biotechnology and Public Health, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.
Ileana VigentiniDepartment of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing level of hazardous residues in the environment and food chains has led the European Union to restrict the use of chemical fungicides. Thus, exploiting new natural antagonistic microorganisms against fungal diseases could serve the agricultural production to reduce pre- and post-harvest losses, to boost safer practices for workers and to protect the consumers' health. The main aim of this work was to evaluate the antagonistic potential of epiphytic yeasts against

Indexed as

biocontrolfungal diseasesmoldsV. vinifera ssp sylvestrisyeasts

Identifiers

PMID29163377
PMCPMC5675894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.