Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29163220›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2017

Evaluation of Optogenetic Electrophysiology Tools in Human Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes.

Susann Björk, Elina A Ojala, Tommy Nordström, Antti Ahola, Mikko Liljeström, Jari Hyttinen, Esko Kankuri, Eero Mervaala

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Cardiac optogenetics: shining light on signaling pathways.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Cardiac optogenetics: a decade of enlightenment.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Insights into Cardiac IKs (KCNQ1/KCNE1) Channels Regulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Automatic Optimization of anFrontiers in physiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susann BjörkDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Elina A OjalaDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Tommy NordströmDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Antti AholaBioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland.
Mikko LiljeströmDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine and HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Jari HyttinenBioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland.
Esko KankuriDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Eero MervaalaDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FITampere University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current cardiac drug safety assessments focus on hERG channel block and QT prolongation for evaluating arrhythmic risks, whereas the optogenetic approach focuses on the action potential (AP) waveform generated by a monolayer of human cardiomyocytes beating synchronously, thus assessing the contribution of several ion channels on the overall drug effect. This novel tool provides arrhythmogenic sensitizing by light-induced pacing in combination with non-invasive, all-optical measurements of cardiomyocyte APs and will improve assessment of drug-induced electrophysiological aberrancies. With the help of patch clamp electrophysiology measurements, we aimed to investigate whether the optogenetic modifications alter human cardiomyocytes' electrophysiology and how well the optogenetic analyses perform against this gold standard. Patch clamp electrophysiology measurements of non-transduced stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes compared to cells expressing the commercially available optogenetic constructs Optopatch and CaViar revealed no significant changes in action potential duration (APD) parameters. Thus, inserting the optogenetic constructs into cardiomyocytes does not significantly affect the cardiomyocyte's electrophysiological properties. When comparing the two methods against each other (patch clamp vs. optogenetic imaging) we found no significant differences in APD parameters for the Optopatch transduced cells, whereas the CaViar transduced cells exhibited modest increases in APD-values measured with optogenetic imaging. Thus, to broaden the screen, we combined optogenetic measurements of membrane potential and calcium transients with contractile motion measured by video motion tracking. Furthermore, to assess how optogenetic measurements can predict changes in membrane potential, or early afterdepolarizations (EADs), cells were exposed to cumulating doses of E-4031, a hERG potassium channel blocker, and drug effects were measured at both spontaneous and paced beating rates (1, 2 Hz). Cumulating doses of E-4031 produced prolonged APDs, followed by EADs and drug-induced quiescence. These observations were corroborated by patch clamp and contractility measurements. Similar responses, although more modest were seen with the I

Indexed as

arrhythmiacardiac electrophysiologycontractile motionhERGhuman iPSC-derived cardiomyocytesoptical action potentialoptogeneticssafety pharmacology

Identifiers

PMID29163220
PMCPMC5673656
OpenAlexW2766106484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.