Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29163214›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2017

Predictive Value of Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation Assessment in Surgical Management of Patients with High-Grade Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Vladimir B Semenyutin, Gregory A Asaturyan, Anna A Nikiforova, Vugar A Aliev, Grigory K Panuntsev, Vadim B Iblyaminov, Alexander V Savello, Andreas Patzak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cerebral Autoregulation in Stroke.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vladimir B SemenyutinLaboratory of Brain Circulation Pathology, Federal Almazov Medical Research Center, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Gregory A AsaturyanLaboratory of Brain Circulation Pathology, Federal Almazov Medical Research Center, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Anna A NikiforovaLaboratory of Brain Circulation Pathology, Federal Almazov Medical Research Center, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Vugar A AlievLaboratory of Brain Circulation Pathology, Federal Almazov Medical Research Center, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Grigory K PanuntsevLaboratory of Brain Circulation Pathology, Federal Almazov Medical Research Center, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Vadim B IblyaminovLaboratory of Brain Circulation Pathology, Federal Almazov Medical Research Center, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Alexander V SavelloLaboratory of Brain Circulation Pathology, Federal Almazov Medical Research Center, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Andreas PatzakJohannes-Mueller Institute of Physiology University Hospital Charite, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (DCA) capacity along with the degree of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis and characteristics of the plaque can also play an important role in selection of appropriate treatment strategy. This study aims to classify the patients with severe ICA stenosis according to preoperative state of DCA and to assess its dynamics after surgery. Thirty-five patients with severe ICA stenosis having different clinical type of disease underwent reconstructive surgery. DCA was assessed with transfer function analysis (TFA) by calculating phase shift (PS) between Mayer waves of blood flow velocity (BFV) and blood pressure (BP) before and after operation. In 18 cases, regardless of clinical type, preoperative PS on ipsilateral side was within the normal range and did not change considerably after surgery. In other 17 cases preoperative PS was reliably lower both in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic stenosis. Surgical reconstruction led to restoration of impaired DCA evidenced by significant increase of PS in postoperative period. Our data suggest that regardless clinical type of disease various state of DCA may be present in patients with severe ICA stenosis. This finding can contribute to establishing the optimal treatment strategy, and first of all for asymptomatic patients. Patients with compromised DCA should be considered as ones with higher risk of stroke and first candidates for reconstructive surgery.

Indexed as

carotid artery stenosiscerebral autoregulationcerebral hemodynamicssurgery/endarterectomytranscranial Doppler

Identifiers

PMID29163214
PMCPMC5673646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.