Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29163119›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2017

Running Neuroimaging Applications on Amazon Web Services: How, When, and at What Cost?

Tara M Madhyastha, Natalie Koh, Trevor K M Day, Moises Hernández-Fernández, Austin Kelley, Daniel J Peterson, Sabreena Rajan, Karl A Woelfer, Jonathan Wolf, Thomas J Grabowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Data Science in Environmental Health Research.Current epidemiology reports · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tara M MadhyasthaDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Natalie KohDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Trevor K M DayDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Moises Hernández-FernándezCentre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Austin KelleyDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Daniel J PetersonDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Sabreena RajanDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Karl A WoelferDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Jonathan WolfDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Thomas J GrabowskiDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

Funding

THERAPEUTIC EFFECTS OF INTRA-NASAL INSULIN DETEMIRP50AG005136 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JAYADEY, SUMAN · 1985 to 2019
$57.2M
Udall Center Director's meeting poster awardP50NS062684 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MONTINE, THOMAS J · 2009 to 2020
$18.3M
Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterU54HD083091 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DOHERTY, DANIEL · 2014 to 2019
$7.9M
NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005136NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083091NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS062684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The contribution of this paper is to identify and describe current best practices for using Amazon Web Services (AWS) to execute neuroimaging workflows "in the cloud." Neuroimaging offers a vast set of techniques by which to interrogate the structure and function of the living brain. However, many of the scientists for whom neuroimaging is an extremely important tool have limited training in parallel computation. At the same time, the field is experiencing a surge in computational demands, driven by a combination of data-sharing efforts, improvements in scanner technology that allow acquisition of images with higher image resolution, and by the desire to use statistical techniques that stress processing requirements. Most neuroimaging workflows can be executed as independent parallel jobs and are therefore excellent candidates for running on AWS, but the overhead of learning to do so and determining whether it is worth the cost can be prohibitive. In this paper we describe how to identify neuroimaging workloads that are appropriate for running on AWS, how to benchmark execution time, and how to estimate cost of running on AWS. By benchmarking common neuroimaging applications, we show that cloud computing can be a viable alternative to on-premises hardware. We present guidelines that neuroimaging labs can use to provide a cluster-on-demand type of service that should be familiar to users, and scripts to estimate cost and create such a cluster.

Indexed as

cloud computingneuroimaging pipelinesreproducibilityworkflow

Identifiers

PMID29163119
PMCPMC5675877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.