Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29162934›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2018

Decision making and experiences of young adults undergoing presymptomatic genetic testing for familial cancer: a longitudinal grounded theory study.

Lea Godino, Leigh Jackson, Daniela Turchetti, Catherine Hennessy, Heather Skirton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Factors impacting adolescent and young adult cancer patients' decision to pursue genetic counseling and testing.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A framework for youth-friendly genetic counseling.Journal of community genetics · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lea GodinoCenter for Studies on Hereditary Cancer, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, and Unit of Medical Genetics, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, 40138, Italy. lea.godino@studio.unibo.it.
Leigh JacksonSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, Plymouth University, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK.
Daniela TurchettiCenter for Studies on Hereditary Cancer, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, and Unit of Medical Genetics, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, 40138, Italy.
Catherine HennessyFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, School of Health and Social Care, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, BH12 5BB, UK.
Heather SkirtonSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, Plymouth University, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK.
University of Bologna · ITUniversity of Plymouth · GBBournemouth University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enabling informed choice is an essential component of care when offering young adults presymptomatic testing for a genetic condition. A systematic review on this topic revealed that many young adults grew up with little information regarding their genetic risk and that parents had applied pressure to them during the testing decision-making process. However, none of the studies retrieved were conducted in South European countries. To address this gap, we undertook a qualitative study based on grounded theory to explore the psychosocial implications of presymptomatic testing for hereditary cancer in Italian young adults aged 18-30 years. Interviews were conducted on three occasions: 1 month before counselling, and 2 weeks and 6 months after results. Data were coded and grouped under themes. A total of 42 interviews were conducted. Four themes emerged: knowledge, genetic counselling process, decision making and dealing with test results. Although participants grew up with little or no information about their genetic risk, none expressed regret at having the test at a young age. Pre-test counselling was appreciated as a source of information, rather than support for decision making. Decisions were often made autonomously and sometimes conflicted with parents' wishes. Participants reported no changes in health behaviours after testing. This evidence highlights the need for a comprehensive, longitudinal counselling process with appropriate timing and setting, which supports 'parent-to-offspring' risk communication first and decision making by young adults about presymptomatic testing and risk management afterwards. In conclusion, it is clear that counselling approaches for presymptomatic testing may require modification both for young adults and their parents.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdolescentAdultAsymptomatic DiseasesFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansInformed ConsentMaleNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID29162934
PMCPMC5839040
OpenAlexW2770281277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.