Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29162894›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Temporary Diverting Stoma Improves Recovery of Anastomotic Leakage after Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer.

Yuchen Wu, Hongtu Zheng, Tianan Guo, Adili Keranmu, Fangqi Liu, Ye Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dehiscence of colorectal anastomosis treated with noninvasive procedures.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuchen WuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Hongtu ZhengDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Tianan GuoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Adili KeranmuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Fangqi LiuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Ye XuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China. xu_shirley021@163.com.
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temporary diverting stoma might be a protective factor for the prevention of anastomotic leakage (AL) after anterior resection. Its role in leakage recovery is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of temporary diverting stoma on anastomotic leakage severity and recovery. We analyzed 323 patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer and developed anastomotic leakage, in which 44 had temporary diverting stoma. Association between diverting stoma and occurrence of anastomotic leakage, recovery time, length of hospital stay, overall costs, local and distant relapse-free survival were further studied. In non-severe AL group, temporary diverting stoma improved leakage recovery by 4 days (mean: 20.7 days vs. 16.1 days, p = 0.031), especially in patients who did not receive neoadjuvant treatment (mean time: 20.9 days vs. 14.4 days, p = 0.016). However, it did not delay the occurrence of anastomotic leakage. Moreover, no significant difference was found in the overall length of hospital stay and costs among patients with versus without a diverting stoma. In severe AL group, however, no difference was detected. The advantage of shortened leakage recovery did not reduce the local and distant relapse-free survival. In conclusion, our findings indicated the recovery benefit from diverting stoma in patients with anterior resection.

Indexed as

Surgical StomasAnastomotic LeakDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansIncidenceLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRectal NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID29162894
PMCPMC5698498
OpenAlexW2768969483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.