ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2017
Semiconductor Sequencing Analysis of Chromosomal Copy Number Variations in Spontaneous Miscarriage.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The chromosomal characteristics of spontaneous abortion and its potential associated copy number variants and genes.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Chromosomal Copy Number Variation Analysis in Pregnancy Products from Recurrent and Sporadic Miscarriage Using Next-Generation Sequencing.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2022Article
- Copy number variation characterization and possible candidate genes in miscarriage and stillbirth by next-generation sequencing analysis.The journal of gene medicine · 2021Article
- Analysis of Genomic Copy Number Variation in Miscarriages During Early and Middle Pregnancy.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Detection of chromosomal abnormalities in spontaneous miscarriage by low‑coverage next‑generation sequencing.Molecular medicine reports · 2020Article
- Copy Number Variations in Female Infertility in China.Balkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Array CGH is the criterion standard for identifying copy number variations (CNV), but the restrictive requirement of DNA quality and relatively high cost prevent the use of this method as a general assay in hospitals in developing countries. Our principal objective was to determine whether the semiconductor sequencing platform (SSP) could be an alternative method in CNV detection for spontaneous miscarriage. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 443 spontaneous miscarriage samples were collected and subjected to low-coverage (0.1X) whole-genome analysis by SSP. These samples were verified by array CGH and 8 low-quality DNA samples were analyzed by SSP and validated by MLPA. RESULTS SSP detected 195 chromosomal numerical abnormalities, 74 CNVs, and 9 mosaicisms among the 435 samples. Among 74 CNV abnormalities, SSP detected an equal number (56) of CNVs 56 >1 Mb with array CGH. However, SSP missed more 6 cases CNVs <1 Mb than array CGH (12 vs. 18). SSP detected more mosaicisms than array CGH (9 vs. 7, p=0.5). Interestingly, SSP detected the mosaicism which had only 8% X monosomy, which was much lower than the minimal percentage of monosomy that was detected by array CGH. CONCLUSIONS SSP is of equivalent efficacy as array CGH in detecting CNVs >1 Mb, and performs better in identifying mosaicism. With the merits of low cost and less demand of input DNA, SSP is a good alternative for use in genetic diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.