Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29162795›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2017

Semiconductor Sequencing Analysis of Chromosomal Copy Number Variations in Spontaneous Miscarriage.

Ming-Zhu Wang, Fang-Qin Lin, Min Li, Dan He, Qi-Hong Yu, Xue-Xi Yang, Ying-Song Wu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Copy Number Variations in Female Infertility in China.Balkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ming-Zhu WangInstitute of Antibody Engineering, School of Laboratory Medical and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Fang-Qin LinGuangzhou Darui Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Min LiInstitute of Antibody Engineering, School of Laboratory Medical and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Dan HeGuangzhou Darui Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Qi-Hong YuGuangzhou DAAN Center for Clinical Laboratory Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Xue-Xi YangInstitute of Antibody Engineering, School of Laboratory Medical and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Ying-Song WuInstitute of Antibody Engineering, School of Laboratory Medical and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Southern Medical University · CNChina Guangzhou Analysis and Testing Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Array CGH is the criterion standard for identifying copy number variations (CNV), but the restrictive requirement of DNA quality and relatively high cost prevent the use of this method as a general assay in hospitals in developing countries. Our principal objective was to determine whether the semiconductor sequencing platform (SSP) could be an alternative method in CNV detection for spontaneous miscarriage. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 443 spontaneous miscarriage samples were collected and subjected to low-coverage (0.1X) whole-genome analysis by SSP. These samples were verified by array CGH and 8 low-quality DNA samples were analyzed by SSP and validated by MLPA. RESULTS SSP detected 195 chromosomal numerical abnormalities, 74 CNVs, and 9 mosaicisms among the 435 samples. Among 74 CNV abnormalities, SSP detected an equal number (56) of CNVs 56 >1 Mb with array CGH. However, SSP missed more 6 cases CNVs <1 Mb than array CGH (12 vs. 18). SSP detected more mosaicisms than array CGH (9 vs. 7, p=0.5). Interestingly, SSP detected the mosaicism which had only 8% X monosomy, which was much lower than the minimal percentage of monosomy that was detected by array CGH. CONCLUSIONS SSP is of equivalent efficacy as array CGH in detecting CNVs >1 Mb, and performs better in identifying mosaicism. With the merits of low cost and less demand of input DNA, SSP is a good alternative for use in genetic diagnosis.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousChromosome AberrationsChromosomesComparative Genomic HybridizationDNADNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePregnancyWhole Genome SequencingDNA

Identifiers

PMID29162795
PMCPMC5707912
OpenAlexW2771027359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.