Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29162138›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2017

Predictability of the effects of facet joint infiltration in the degenerate lumbar spine when assessing MRI scans.

Ulf Krister Hofmann, Ramona Luise Keller, Christian Walter, Falk Mittag

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03308149 (Predictability of the Effects of Facet Joint Infiltration in the Degenerate Lumbar Spine When Assessing MRI Scans), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03308149 completednot on this map

Predictability of the Effects of Facet Joint Infiltration in the Degenerate Lumbar Spine When Assessing MRI Scans

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital TuebingenRan2016 to 2017Enrolled50ConditionsInfiltration Facet JointArmsinfiltration with triamcinolone and bupivacaine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and safety of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Trial
  2. Lumbar Facet Joint Disease: What, Why, and When?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ulf Krister HofmannDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. ulf.hofmann@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Ramona Luise KellerFaculty of Medicine, Julius-Maximilians University of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str.2, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Christian WalterDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Falk MittagDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
University of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImaging results are frequently considered as hallmarks of disease by spine surgeons to plan their future treatment strategy. Numerous classification systems have been proposed to quantify or grade lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and thus objectify imaging findings. The clinical impact of the measured parameters remains, however, unclear. To evaluate the pathological significance of imaging findings in patients with multisegmental degenerative findings, clinicians can perform image-guided local infiltrations to target defined areas such as the facet joints. The aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate the correlation of MRI facet joint degeneration and spinal stenosis measurements with improvement obtained by image-guided intraarticular facet joint infiltration.

methodsFifty MRI scans of patients with chronic lumbar back pain were graded radiologically using a wide range of classification and measurement systems. The reported effect of facet joint injections at the site was recorded, and a comparative analysis performed.

resultsWhen we allocated patients according to their reported pain relief, 27 showed no improvement (0-30%), 16 reported good improvement (31-75%) and 7 reported excellent improvement (> 75%). MRI features assessed in this study did, however, not show any relevant correlation with reported pain after facet joint infiltration: Values for Kendall's tau ranged from τ = - 0.190 for neuroforaminal stenosis grading as suggested by Lee, to τ = 0.133 for posterior disc height as proposed by Hasegawa.

conclusionDespite the trend in evidence-based medicine to provide medical algorithms, our findings underline the continuing need for individualised spine care that, along with imaging techniques or targeted infiltrations, includes diagnostic dimensions such as good patient history and clinical examination to formulate a diagnosis.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03308149 , retrospectively registered October 2017.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularLow Back PainLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSpinal StenosisZygapophyseal JointFacet joint degenerationFacet joint injectionLumbar degenerative diseaseLumbar spinal stenosisMRI

Identifiers

PMID29162138
PMCPMC5699022
OpenAlexW2769721924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.