Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29162089›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

Patient perspectives on continuity of care: adaption and preliminary psychometric assessment of a Norwegian version of the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire (NCQ-N).

Øystein Hetlevik, Merethe Hustoft, Annemarie Uijen, Jörg Aßmus, Sturla Gjesdal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The effect of team collaboration and continuity of care on health and disability among rehabilitation patients: a longitudinal survey-based study from western Norway.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Care Provided to Women Victims of Intimate Partner Violence From the Perspective of Health Professionals.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Øystein HetlevikDepartment of Global Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, PO-box 7804, N-5020, Bergen, Norway. oystein.hetlevik@uib.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8912-3426
Merethe HustoftDepartment of Global Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, PO-box 7804, N-5020, Bergen, Norway.
Annemarie UijenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jörg AßmusCentre for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Sturla GjesdalDepartment of Global Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, PO-box 7804, N-5020, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinuity of care is regarded as a core quality element in healthcare. Continuity can be related to one or more specific caregivers but also applies to collaboration within a team or across boundaries of healthcare. Measuring continuity is important to identify problems and evaluate quality improvement of interventions. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and psychometric properties of a Norwegian version of the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire (NCQ).

methodsThe NCQ was developed in The Netherlands. It measures patients' experienced continuity of care across multiple care settings and as a multidimensional concept regardless of morbidity. The NCQ comprises 28 items categorised into three subscales; two personal continuity scales, "care giver knows me" and "shows commitment", asked regarding the patient's general practitioner (GP) and the most important specialist; and one "team/cross boundary continuity" scale, asked regarding primary care, specialised care and cooperation between GP and specialist, with a total of seven factors. The NCQ was translated and adapted to Norwegian (NCQ-N) and distributed among patients referred to somatic rehabilitation (N = 984, response rate 34.5%). Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA), Cronbach's alpha, intra-class correlation (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess psychometric properties.

resultsAll patients (N = 375) who had responded to all parts of the NCQ-N were included in CFA. The CFA fit indices (CFI 0.941, RMSEA 0.064 (95% CI 0.059-0.070), SRMR 0.041) support a seven-factor structure in the NCQ-N based on the three subscales of the original NCQ. Cronbach's alpha showed internal consistency (0.84-0.97), and was highest for the team/cross-boundary subscales. The NCQ-N showed overall high reliability with ICC 0.84-91 for personal continuity factors and 0.67-0.91 for team factors, with the lowest score for team continuity within primary care.

conclusionsPsychometric assessment of the NCQ-N supports that this instrument, based on the three subscales of the original Dutch NCQ, captures the concept of "continuity of care" among adult patients with a variety of longstanding medical conditions who use healthcare on a regular basis. However, its usefulness among varied patient groups, including younger people, patients with acute disorders and individuals with mental health problems, should be further evaluated.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CarePatient SatisfactionPsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedDelivery of Health CareFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMorbidityNorwayPrimary Health CareReproducibility of ResultsContinuity of careGeneral practiceHealthcareHealth service researchPatient reported outcome measure

Identifiers

PMID29162089
PMCPMC5698962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.