Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29161979›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric oncology nursing : official journal of the Association of Pediatric Oncology Nurses

Clinical Characteristics of Intravenous PEG-Asparaginase Hypersensitivity Reactions in Patients Undergoing Treatment for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [Formula: see text].

Emily K Browne, Christina Moore, April Sykes, Zhaohua Lu, Sima Jeha, Belinda N Mandrell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric oncology nursing : official journal of the Association of Pediatric Oncology Nurses. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Antibodies Predict Pegaspargase Allergic Reactions and Failure of Rechallenge.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily K BrowneSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Christina MooreSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
April SykesSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Zhaohua LuSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Sima JehaSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Belinda N MandrellSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
PROFESSIONAL ONCOLOGY EDUCATION PROGRAMR25CA023944 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI SUZANNE A. GRONEMEYER · 1986 to 2026
$8.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NCI NIH HHS R25 CA023944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsparaginase poses a substantial risk for hypersensitivity reactions during and after administration; however, these reactions vary by asparaginase formulation and administration route. It is imperative that nurses be knowledgeable of clinical symptoms associated with intravenous (IV) monomethoxypolyethylene glycol (PEG)-asparaginase reactions, as well as potential reaction timing. PURPOSE: This single institution retrospective study describes the clinical factors among patients with IV PEG-asparaginase hypersensitivity reactions.

methodsReaction frequency and severity, dose, phase of treatment, and time between infusion initiation and reaction were collected on patients identified as having an IV PEG-asparaginase hypersensitivity reaction while undergoing acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment.

resultsSixty-three patients (12.8%) developed a hypersensitivity reaction to IV PEG-asparaginase, with the reaction occurring during a median of 3 doses in both risk arms. Reactions were noted ≤60 minutes after infusion initiation in 98% of patients, and no reactions were fatal.

conclusionNurses should carefully observe patients throughout the infusion and anticipate adverse reactions, particularly during the first 3 doses and first 10 minutes of each infusion. Patient and family education should include the rare risk of delayed reactions.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntineoplastic AgentsAsparaginaseChildChild, PreschoolDrug Administration ScheduleDrug HypersensitivityFemaleHumansInfantInfusions, IntravenousMaleOncology NursingPediatric NursingPolyethylene GlycolsPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaAntineoplastic AgentsAsparaginasepegaspargasePolyethylene GlycolsallergyhypersensitivitynursingPEG-asparaginasereaction

Identifiers

PMID29161979
PMCPMC5803366
OpenAlexW2769665802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.