Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29161471›Full record

ArticleArthritis care & research2018

Peer-to-Peer Mentoring for African American Women With Lupus: A Feasibility Pilot.

Edith M Williams, J Madison Hyer, Ramakrishnan Viswanathan, Trevor D Faith, Delia Voronca, Mulugeta Gebregziabher, Jim C Oates, Leonard Egede

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis care & research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edith M WilliamsMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
J Madison HyerMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Ramakrishnan ViswanathanMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Trevor D FaithMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Delia VoroncaMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Mulugeta GebregziabherMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Jim C OatesMedical University of South Carolina and Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston.
Leonard EgedeMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Medical University of South Carolina · USMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR001450 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T., FLUME, PATRICK A · 2015 to 2024
$41.1M
SOUTH CAROLINA CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE (SCTR)UL1RR029882 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2009 to 2011
$10.1M
Resource CoreP30AR072582 · NIAMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Paul J Nietert · 2017 to 2026
$8.5M
Patient Resource CoreP60AR062755 · NIAMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI SILVER, RICHARD M. · 2012 to 2016
$5.8M
The Role of Vitamin D in Systemic Lupus ErythematosusK23AR052364 · NIAMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KAMEN, DIANE L · 2007 to 2011
$647k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001450NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR029882NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR052364NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR072582NIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR062755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the feasibility and potential benefits of peer mentoring to improve the disease self-management and quality of life of individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

methodsPeer mentors were trained and paired with up to 3 mentees to receive self-management education and support by telephone over 12 weeks. This study took place at an academic teaching hospital in Charleston, South Carolina. Seven quads consisting of 1 peer mentor and 3 mentees were matched, based on factors such as age, area of residence, and marital and work status. Mentee outcomes of self-management, health-related quality of life, and disease activity were measured using validated tools at baseline, mid-intervention, and post-intervention. Descriptive statistics and effect sizes were calculated to determine clinically important (>0.3) changes from baseline.

resultsMentees showed trends toward lower disease activity (P = 0.004) and improved health-related quality of life, in the form of decreased anxiety (P = 0.018) and decreased depression (P = 0.057). Other improvements in health-related quality of life were observed with effect sizes >0.3, but did not reach statistical significance. In addition, both mentees and mentors gave very high scores for perceived treatment credibility and service delivery.

conclusionThe intervention was well received. Training, the peer-mentoring program, and outcome measures were demonstrated to be feasible with modifications. This result provides preliminary support for the efficacy, acceptability, and perceived credibility of a peer-mentoring approach to improve disease self-management and health-related quality of life in African American women with SLE. Peer mentoring may augment current rheumatologic care.

Indexed as

MentoringBlack or African AmericanFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLupus Erythematosus, SystemicPilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID29161471
PMCPMC5962359
OpenAlexW2770085109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.