Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29161371›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of orthodontics2018

Long-term remineralizing effect of MI Paste Plus on regression of early caries after orthodontic fixed appliance treatment: a 12-month follow-up randomized controlled trial.

Moniek W Beerens, Jacob M Ten Cate, Mark J Buijs, Monique H van der Veen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of orthodontics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Moniek W BeerensDepartment of Orthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jacob M Ten CateDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark J BuijsDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Monique H van der VeenDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Casein-phosphopeptide-amorphous-calcium-fluoride-phosphate (CPP-ACFP) can remineralize subsurface lesions. It is the active ingredient of MI-Paste-Plus® (MPP). The long-term remineralization efficacy is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the long-term effect of MPP versus a placebo paste on remineralization of enamel after fixed orthodontic treatment over a 12-month period. Design: This trial was designed as a prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled RCT. Methods: Patients with subsurface lesions scheduled for removal of the appliance were included. They applied either MPP or control paste once a day at bedtime for 12 months, complementary to normal oral hygiene. Main outcome measures: Changes in enamel lesions (primary outcome) were fluorescence loss and lesion area determined by quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF). Secondary outcomes were Microbial composition, by conventional plating, and acidogenicity of plaque, by capillary ion analysis (CIA), and lesion changes scored visually on clinical photographs. Randomization: Participants [age = 15.5 years (SD = 1.6)] were randomly assigned to either the MPP or the control group, as determined by a computer-randomization scheme, created and locked before the start of the study. Participants received neutral-coloured concealed toothpaste tubes marked A or B. Blinding: The patients and the observers were blinded with respect to the content of tube A or B. Results: A total of 51 patients were analysed; MPP (n = 25) versus control group (n = 26); data loss (n = 14). There was no significant difference between the groups over time for all the used outcome measures. There was a significant improvement in enamel lesions (fluorescence loss) over time in both groups (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001), with no differences between groups. Limitations: Being an in vivo study, non-compliance of the subjects could have influenced the result. Conclusion: The additional use of MPP in patients with subsurface enamel lesions after orthodontic fixed appliance treatment did not improve these lesions during the 1 year following debonding. Registration: This trial is registered at the medical ethical committee of the VU Medical Centre in Amsterdam (NL.199226.029.07).

Indexed as

AdolescentCariostatic AgentsCaseinsDental CariesDental EnamelDental PlaqueDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleOrthodontic Appliances, FixedProspective StudiesToothpastesTooth RemineralizationYoung AdultCariostatic Agentscasein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate nanocomplexCaseinsToothpastes

Identifiers

PMID29161371
PMCPMC6160597
OpenAlexW2769769275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.