Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29161340›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2019

Prefrontal Executive Control Rescues Risk for Anxiety Associated with High Threat and Low Reward Brain Function.

Matthew A Scult, Annchen R Knodt, Spenser R Radtke, Bartholomew D Brigidi, Ahmad R Hariri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Neurobiological Markers of Resilience to Early-Life Adversity During Adolescence.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew A ScultLaboratory of NeuroGenetics, Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Annchen R KnodtLaboratory of NeuroGenetics, Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Spenser R RadtkeLaboratory of NeuroGenetics, Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Bartholomew D BrigidiLaboratory of NeuroGenetics, Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Ahmad R HaririLaboratory of NeuroGenetics, Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

Quantifying Individual Differences in Midlife Structural Brain Integrity Associated with Later AD/ADRD RiskR01AG049789 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI AHMAD R. HARIRI, TERRIE E MOFFITT · 2015 to 2026
$10.6M
Neurogenetic Pathways to Drug Use in Young AdultsR01DA033369 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HARIRI, AHMAD R. · 2013 to 2016
$1.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG049789NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared with neural biomarkers of risk for mental illness, little is known about biomarkers of resilience. We explore if greater executive control-related prefrontal activity may function as a resilience biomarker by "rescuing" risk associated with higher threat-related amygdala and lower reward-related ventral striatum activity. Functional MRI was used to assay baseline threat-related amygdala, reward-related ventral striatum, and executive control-related prefrontal activity in 120 young adult volunteers. Participants provided self-reported mood and anxiety ratings at baseline and follow-up. A moderation model revealed a significant three-way interaction wherein higher amygdala and lower ventral striatum activity predicted increases in anxiety in those with average or low but not high prefrontal activity. This effect was specific to anxiety, with the neural biomarkers explaining ~10% of the variance in change over time, above and beyond baseline symptoms, sex, age, IQ, presence or absence of DMS-IV diagnosis, and both early and recent stress. Our findings are consistent with the importance of top-down executive control in adaptive regulation of negative emotions, and highlight a unique combination of neural biomarkers that may identify at-risk individuals for whom the adoption of strategies to improve executive control of negative emotions may prove particularly beneficial.

Indexed as

RewardAnxietyExecutive FunctionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrefrontal CortexRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29161340
PMCPMC6490969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.