Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29161298›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Controlled placement of multiple CNS cell populations to create complex neuronal cultures.

D Soscia, A Belle, N Fischer, H Enright, A Sales, J Osburn, W Benett, E Mukerjee, K Kulp, S Pannu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Novel, Emerging Chip Models of the Blood-Brain Barrier and Future Directions.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Organ-On-A-ChipFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

D SosciaEngineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3489-4463
A BelleEngineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, United States of America.
N FischerPhysical and Life Science Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, United States of America.
H EnrightPhysical and Life Science Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, United States of America.
A SalesPhysical and Life Science Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, United States of America.
J OsburnPhysical and Life Science Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, United States of America.
W BenettEngineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, United States of America.
E MukerjeeEngineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, United States of America.
K KulpPhysical and Life Science Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, United States of America.
S PannuEngineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, United States of America.
E WheelerEngineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro brain-on-a-chip platforms hold promise in many areas including: drug discovery, evaluating effects of toxicants and pathogens, and disease modelling. A more accurate recapitulation of the intricate organization of the brain in vivo may require a complex in vitro system including organization of multiple neuronal cell types in an anatomically-relevant manner. Most approaches for compartmentalizing or segregating multiple cell types on microfabricated substrates use either permanent physical surface features or chemical surface functionalization. This study describes a removable insert that successfully deposits neurons from different brain areas onto discrete regions of a microelectrode array (MEA) surface, achieving a separation distance of 100 μm. The regional seeding area on the substrate is significantly smaller than current platforms using comparable placement methods. The non-permanent barrier between cell populations allows the cells to remain localized and attach to the substrate while the insert is in place and interact with neighboring regions after removal. The insert was used to simultaneously seed primary rodent hippocampal and cortical neurons onto MEAs. These cells retained their morphology, viability, and function after seeding through the cell insert through 28 days in vitro (DIV). Co-cultures of the two neuron types developed processes and formed integrated networks between the different MEA regions. Electrophysiological data demonstrated characteristic bursting features and waveform shapes that were consistent for each neuron type in both mono- and co-culture. Additionally, hippocampal cells co-cultured with cortical neurons showed an increase in within-burst firing rate (p = 0.013) and percent spikes in bursts (p = 0.002), changes that imply communication exists between the two cell types in co-culture. The cell seeding insert described in this work is a simple but effective method of separating distinct neuronal populations on microfabricated devices, and offers a unique approach to developing the types of complex in vitro cellular environments required for anatomically-relevant brain-on-a-chip devices.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBrainCell LineageCells, CulturedCoculture TechniquesMicroelectrodesNeuronsRats

Identifiers

PMID29161298
PMCPMC5697820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.