ArticlePloS one2017
Controlled placement of multiple CNS cell populations to create complex neuronal cultures.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal and Noninvasive Intracellular Recordings of Spontaneous Electrophysiological Activity in Rat Primary Neurons on Planar MEA Electrodes.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Direct effects of prolonged TNF-α and IL-6 exposure on neural activity in human iPSC-derived neuron-astrocyte co-cultures.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Article
- Investigating Communication Dynamics in Neuronal Network using 3D Gold Microelectrode Arrays.ACS nano · 2024Article
- Biphasic response of human iPSC-derived neural network activity following exposure to a sarin-surrogate nerve agent.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024Article
- Spatiotemporal analysis of 3D human iPSC-derived neural networks using a 3D multi-electrode array.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023Article
- The microbiota-gut-brain axis and epilepsy from a multidisciplinary perspective: Clinical evidence and technological solutions for improvement of in vitro preclinical models.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2022Review
- Dose-dependent consequences of sub-chronic fentanyl exposure on neuron and glial co-cultures.Frontiers in toxicology · 2022Article
- Novel, Emerging Chip Models of the Blood-Brain Barrier and Future Directions.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Brain-on-a-Chip: Characterizing the next generation of advancedAPL bioengineering · 2021Article
- Chlorpyrifos Disrupts Acetylcholine Metabolism Across Model Blood-Brain Barrier.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Recent progress in translational engineered in vitro models of the central nervous system.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2020Review
- Functional and transcriptional characterization of complex neuronal co-cultures.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Tissue-specific extracellular matrix accelerates the formation of neural networks and communities in a neuron-glia co-culture on a multi-electrode array.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Hindbrain V2a Neurons Pattern Rhythmic Activity of Motor Neurons in a Reticulospinal Coculture.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Organ-On-A-ChipFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Review
- Disease-modifying effects of metabolic perturbations in ALS/FTLD.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2018Review
- Microphysiological systems: analysis of the current status, challenges and commercial future.Microphysiological systems · 2018Article
- Evaluation of in vitro neuronal platforms as surrogates for in vivo whole brain systems.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In vitro brain-on-a-chip platforms hold promise in many areas including: drug discovery, evaluating effects of toxicants and pathogens, and disease modelling. A more accurate recapitulation of the intricate organization of the brain in vivo may require a complex in vitro system including organization of multiple neuronal cell types in an anatomically-relevant manner. Most approaches for compartmentalizing or segregating multiple cell types on microfabricated substrates use either permanent physical surface features or chemical surface functionalization. This study describes a removable insert that successfully deposits neurons from different brain areas onto discrete regions of a microelectrode array (MEA) surface, achieving a separation distance of 100 μm. The regional seeding area on the substrate is significantly smaller than current platforms using comparable placement methods. The non-permanent barrier between cell populations allows the cells to remain localized and attach to the substrate while the insert is in place and interact with neighboring regions after removal. The insert was used to simultaneously seed primary rodent hippocampal and cortical neurons onto MEAs. These cells retained their morphology, viability, and function after seeding through the cell insert through 28 days in vitro (DIV). Co-cultures of the two neuron types developed processes and formed integrated networks between the different MEA regions. Electrophysiological data demonstrated characteristic bursting features and waveform shapes that were consistent for each neuron type in both mono- and co-culture. Additionally, hippocampal cells co-cultured with cortical neurons showed an increase in within-burst firing rate (p = 0.013) and percent spikes in bursts (p = 0.002), changes that imply communication exists between the two cell types in co-culture. The cell seeding insert described in this work is a simple but effective method of separating distinct neuronal populations on microfabricated devices, and offers a unique approach to developing the types of complex in vitro cellular environments required for anatomically-relevant brain-on-a-chip devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.