Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29161261›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2017

mRNA processing in mutant zebrafish lines generated by chemical and CRISPR-mediated mutagenesis produces unexpected transcripts that escape nonsense-mediated decay.

Jennifer L Anderson, Timothy S Mulligan, Meng-Chieh Shen, Hui Wang, Catherine M Scahill, Frederick J Tan, Shao J Du, Elisabeth M Busch-Nentwich, Steven A Farber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Loss ofJBMR plus · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Follistatin like-1 (Adipocyte · 2024
    Article
  16. Loss ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jennifer L AndersonCarnegie Institution for Science, Department of Embryology, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7015-5791
Timothy S MulliganCarnegie Institution for Science, Department of Embryology, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6046-4523
Meng-Chieh ShenCarnegie Institution for Science, Department of Embryology, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Hui WangUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9432-6233
Catherine M ScahillWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.
Frederick J TanCarnegie Institution for Science, Department of Embryology, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Shao J DuUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Elisabeth M Busch-NentwichWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6450-744X
Steven A FarberCarnegie Institution for Science, Department of Embryology, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8037-7312

Funding

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGYT32GM007231 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI VAN DOREN, MARK B · 1985 to 2020
$18.4M
Systematic Vertebrate Functional GenomicsR01GM063904 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI EKKER, STEPHEN CARL · 2001 to 2025
$10.7M
Identifying genes required for digestive physiology and lipid metabolismR01DK093399 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI STEVEN A FARBER, John F Rawls · 2013 to 2026
$7.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK093399NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM063904NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007231Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As model organism-based research shifts from forward to reverse genetics approaches, largely due to the ease of genome editing technology, a low frequency of abnormal phenotypes is being observed in lines with mutations predicted to lead to deleterious effects on the encoded protein. In zebrafish, this low frequency is in part explained by compensation by genes of redundant or similar function, often resulting from the additional round of teleost-specific whole genome duplication within vertebrates. Here we offer additional explanations for the low frequency of mutant phenotypes. We analyzed mRNA processing in seven zebrafish lines with mutations expected to disrupt gene function, generated by CRISPR/Cas9 or ENU mutagenesis methods. Five of the seven lines showed evidence of altered mRNA processing: one through a skipped exon that did not lead to a frame shift, one through nonsense-associated splicing that did not lead to a frame shift, and three through the use of cryptic splice sites. These results highlight the need for a methodical analysis of the mRNA produced in mutant lines before making conclusions or embarking on studies that assume loss of function as a result of a given genomic change. Furthermore, recognition of the types of adaptations that can occur may inform the strategies of mutant generation.

Indexed as

AnimalsClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCodon, NonsenseExonsGene EditingGene ExpressionGenomeGenomicsMutagenesisMutationNonsense Mediated mRNA DecayRNA, MessengerRNA StabilityZebrafishCodon, NonsenseRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID29161261
PMCPMC5716581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.