Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29161254›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2017

Lansoprazole use and tuberculosis incidence in the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink: A population based cohort.

Tom A Yates, Laurie A Tomlinson, Krishnan Bhaskaran, Sinead Langan, Sara Thomas, Liam Smeeth, Ian J Douglas

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Investigation of Potent Anti-Drug design, development and therapy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Fighting Antimicrobial Resistance: Innovative Drugs in Antibacterial Research.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Review
  4. Inhibition mechanism of potential antituberculosis compound lansoprazole sulfide.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Bioenergetic Inhibitors: Antibiotic Efficacy and Mechanisms of Action inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. No Evidence for Acquired Mutations Associated with CytochromeAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tom A YatesInstitute for Global Health, University College London, Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Laurie A TomlinsonLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Krishnan BhaskaranLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Sinead LanganLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Sara ThomasLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Liam SmeethLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Ian J DouglasLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8970-1406
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR/CS/010/014Medical Research Council G0802403Wellcome Trust 205039/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent in vitro and animal studies have found the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) lansoprazole to be highly active against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Omeprazole and pantoprazole have no activity. There is no evidence that, in clinical practice, lansoprazole can treat or prevent incident tuberculosis (TB) disease. METHODS AND

findingsWe studied a cohort of new users of lansoprazole, omeprazole, or pantoprazole from the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink to determine whether lansoprazole users have a lower incidence of TB disease than omeprazole or pantoprazole users. Negative control outcomes of myocardial infarction (MI) and herpes zoster were also studied. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to adjust for potential confounding by a wide range of factors. We identified 527,364 lansoprazole initiators and 923,500 omeprazole or pantoprazole initiators. Lansoprazole users had a lower rate of TB disease (n = 86; 10.0 cases per 100,000 person years; 95% confidence interval 8.1-12.4) than omeprazole or pantoprazole users (n = 193; 15.3 cases per 100,000 person years; 95% confidence interval 13.3-17.7), with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.68 (0.52-0.89). No association was found with MI (adjusted HR 1.04; 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.08) or herpes zoster (adjusted HR 1.03; 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.06). Limitations of this study are that we could not determine whether TB disease was due to reactivation of latent infection or a result of recent transmission, nor could we determine whether lansoprazole would have a beneficial effect if given to people presenting with TB disease.

conclusionsIn this study, use of the commonly prescribed and cheaply available PPI lansoprazole was associated with reduced incidence of TB disease. Given the serious problem of drug resistance and the adverse side effect profiles of many TB drugs, further investigation of lansoprazole as a potential antituberculosis agent is warranted.

Indexed as

2-PyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazolesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceLansoprazoleMaleOmeprazolePantoprazoleProton Pump InhibitorsTuberculosisUnited Kingdom2-PyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazolesLansoprazoleOmeprazolePantoprazoleProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID29161254
PMCPMC5697821
OpenAlexW2769780742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.