Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29161214›Full record

Trial reportJournal of health communication2017

A Randomized Trial of an Advanced Sun Safety Intervention for Vacationers at 41 North American Resorts.

Peter A Andersen, David B Buller, Barbara J Walkosz, Michael D Scott, Larry Beck, Xia Liu, Allison Abbott, Rachel Eye, Gary Cutter

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of health communication, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Golfers' Interest in Multilevel Sun-Protection Strategies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peter A Andersena School of Communication , San Diego State University , San Diego , California , USA.
David B Bullerb Klein Buendel, Inc ., Golden , Colorado , USA.
Barbara J Walkoszb Klein Buendel, Inc ., Golden , Colorado , USA.
Michael D Scottc Mikonics, Inc ., Santa Fe , New Mexico , USA.
Larry Beckd L. Robert Payne School of Hospitality and Tourism Management , San Diego State University , San Diego , California , USA.
Xia Liub Klein Buendel, Inc ., Golden , Colorado , USA.
Allison Abbotta School of Communication , San Diego State University , San Diego , California , USA.
Rachel Eyeb Klein Buendel, Inc ., Golden , Colorado , USA.
Gary Cuttere School of Public Health , University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , Alabama , USA.
Klein Buendel (United States) · USSan Diego State University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Comprehensive Sun Protection in Recreation: An Advanced Go Sun Smart ProgramR01CA152411 · NCI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSEN, PETER ALEX · 2011 to 2015
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA152411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taking vacations in sunny locations is associated with the development of skin cancer. This study tested a multi-component sun protection intervention based on diffusion of innovations theory and transportation theory designed to increase vacationers' comprehensive sun protection, i.e., use of clothing, hats, and shade, and use, pre-application, and reapplication of sunscreen. The trial enrolled 41 warm weather resorts in North America in a pair-matched group randomized pretest-posttest design and assessed samples of adult vacationers at resort outdoor recreation venues regarding sun protection at pretest (n = 3,531) and posttest (n = 3,226). While results showed no overall effect of the intervention on comprehensive sun protection across venues, the intervention produced statistically significant improvements in sun protection at waterside venues (pools and beaches). The intervention's overall effects may have been impeded by a lack of uniformly robust implementation, low interest in skin cancer prevention by guests, or shortcomings of the theories used to create prevention messages. The intervention may have worked best with guests in the highest-risk recreation venue, i.e., waterside recreation where they exposed the most skin. Alternative approaches that alter resort organizations, such as through changes in policy, environmental features, or occupational efforts might be more effective than targeting vacationers with behavior-change messages.

Indexed as

RecreationAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorth AmericaProgram EvaluationProtective ClothingSkin NeoplasmsSunburnSunscreening AgentsUltraviolet RaysYoung AdultSunscreening Agents

Identifiers

PMID29161214
PMCPMC6309206
OpenAlexW2768618843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.