Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29160958›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2018

Prognostic value of an immunohistochemical signature in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing radical esophagectomy.

Jin Meng, Junhua Zhang, Yingjie Xiu, Yan Jin, Jiaqing Xiang, Yongzhan Nie, Shen Fu, Kuaile Zhao

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prognostic Implication of the mFrontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Clinical-morphological profiles of esophageal carcinoma's main types.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jin MengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Junhua ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Yingjie XiuDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yan JinDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiaqing XiangDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yongzhan NieState Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology & Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Shen FuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Kuaile ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we aimed to identify an immunohistochemical (IHC)-based classifier as a prognostic factor in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). A cohort of 235 patients with ESCC undergoing radical esophagectomy (with complete clinical and pathological information) were enrolled in the study. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model, we extracted six IHC features associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and then built a classifier in the discovery cohort (n = 141). The prognostic value of this classifier was further confirmed in the validation cohort (n = 94). Additionally, we developed a nomogram integrating the IHC-based classifier to predict the PFS. We used the IHC-based classifier to stratify patients into high- and low-risk groups. In the discovery cohort, 5-year PFS was 22.4% (95% CI: 0.14-0.36) for the high-risk group and 43.3% (95% CI: 0.32-0.58) for the low-risk group (P = 0.00064), and in the validation cohort, 5-year PFS was 20.58% (95% CI: 0.12-0.36) for the high-risk group and 36.43% (95% CI: 0.22-0.60) for the low-risk group (P = 0.0082). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the IHC-based classifier was an independent prognostic factor for predicting PFS of patients with ESCC. We further developed a nomogram integrating the IHC-based classifier and clinicopathological risk factors (gender, American Joint Committee on Cancer staging, and vascular invasion status) to predict the 3- and 5-year PFS. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated and proved to be clinically useful. Our 6-IHC marker-based classifier is a reliable prognostic tool to facilitate the individual management of patients with ESCC after radical esophagectomy.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorCohort StudiesEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaEsophagectomyEsophagusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSex FactorsBiomarkers, Tumoresophageal squamous cell carcinomaimmunohistochemicalleast absolute shrinkage and selection operator modelprognosticsignature

Identifiers

PMID29160958
PMCPMC5792740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.