Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29160457›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2017

Medicine dispensing service in primary health care of SUS.

Silvana Nair Leite, Noemia Liege Maria da Cunha Bernardo, Juliana Álvares, Augusto Afonso Guerra, Ediná Alves Costa, Francisco de Assis Acurcio, Ione Aquemi Guibu, Karen Sarmento Costa, Margô Gomes de Oliveira Karnikowski, Orlando Mario Soeiro and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Development and Validation of a Clinical Script for Medicine Dispensing.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Silvana Nair LeiteDepartamento de Ciências Farmacêuticas. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC, Brasil.
Noemia Liege Maria da Cunha BernardoUniversidade do Vale do Itajaí. Itajaí, SC, Brasil.
Juliana ÁlvaresDepartamento de Farmácia Social. Faculdade de Farmácia. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Augusto Afonso GuerraDepartamento de Farmácia Social. Faculdade de Farmácia. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Ediná Alves CostaInstituto de Saúde Coletiva. Universidade Federal da Bahia. Salvador, BA, Brasil.
Francisco de Assis AcurcioDepartamento de Farmácia Social. Faculdade de Farmácia. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Ione Aquemi GuibuFaculdade de Ciências Médicas. Santa Casa de São Paulo. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Karen Sarmento CostaNúcleo de Estudos de Políticas Públicas. Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Margô Gomes de Oliveira KarnikowskiFaculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas. Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Orlando Mario SoeiroFaculdade de Ceilândia. Universidade de Brasília. Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Luciano SoaresPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Saúde e Meio Ambiente. Universidade da Região de Joinville. Joinville, SC, Brasil.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo · BRInstituto de Saúde · BRPontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas · BRUniversidade da Região de Joinville · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade do Vale do Itajaí · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo characterize the medicine dispensing services in the primary health care network in Brazil and in its different regions, aiming to promote the access and rational use of medicines.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional, quantitative study with data obtained from the Pesquisa Nacional sobre Acesso, Utilização e Uso Racional de Medicamentos (PNAUM - National Survey on Access, Use and Promotion of Rational Use of Medicines), 2015. Observation visits were carried out in 1,175 dispensing units, and interviews were held with 1,139 professionals responsible for the dispensation of medicines in the dispensing units and 495 municipal coordinators of pharmaceutical services.

resultsMore than half (53%) of the units presented a space smaller than 10 m2 for dispensing of medicines; 23.8% had bars or barriers between users and dispenser; 41.7% had computerized system; and 23.7% had counters for individual care. Among those responsible for dispensation, 87.4% said they always or repeatedly inform users how to use the medicines, and 18.1% reported developing some type of clinical activity. Isolated pharmacies presented a more developed physical and personal structure than those belonging to health units, but we found no significant differences regarding the information provided and the development of clinical activities.

conclusionsThere are major differences in the organization models of dispensation between cities, with regional differences regarding the physical structure and professionals involved. The centralization of medicine dispensing in pharmacies separated from the health services is associated with better structural and professional conditions, as in the dispensing units of the South, Southeast, and Midwest regions. However, the development of dispensation as health service does not prevail in any pharmacy or region of the Country yet.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesGeographyHealth PromotionInterviews as TopicNational Health ProgramsPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical ServicesPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID29160457
PMCPMC5676395
OpenAlexW2761191612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.