Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29160384›Full record

ArticleJornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia

Current use and acceptability of novel diagnostic tests for active tuberculosis: a worldwide survey.

Massimo Amicosante, Lia D'Ambrosio, Marcela Munoz, Fernanda Carvalho de Queiroz Mello, Marc Tebruegge, Novel Njweipi Chegou, Fouad Seghrouchni, Rosella Centis, Delia Goletti, Graham Bothamley and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. International collaboration among medical societies is an effective way to boost Latin American production of articles on tuberculosis.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Eliminating tuberculosis in Latin America: making it the point.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2018
    Article
  16. Rapid molecular test for tuberculosis: impact of its routine use at a referral hospital.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2018
    Article
  17. Tuberculosis: where are we?Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Massimo Amicosante. Dipartimento di Biomedicina e Prevenzione, Università degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata", Roma, Italia.
Lia D'Ambrosio. WHO Collaborating Centre for TB and Lung Diseases, Maugeri Care and Research Institute, Tradate, Italia.
Marcela Munoz. Clínica en Tuberculosis y Enfermedades Pleurales, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias - INER - Ciudad de México, México.
Fernanda Carvalho de Queiroz Mello. Instituto de Doenças do Tórax, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Rio de Janeiro (RJ) Brasil.
Marc Tebruegge. Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Novel Njweipi Chegou. SA MRC Centre for TB Research, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Fouad Seghrouchni. National Institute of Hygiene, Rabat, Morocco.
Rosella Centis. WHO Collaborating Centre for TB and Lung Diseases, Maugeri Care and Research Institute, Tradate, Italia.
Delia Goletti. Unità di Ricerca Translazionale, Dipartimento di Epidemiologia e Ricerca Preclinica, Istituto Nazionale per le Mallatie Infettive - INMI - Lazzaro Spallanzani, Roma, Italia.
Graham Bothamley. Homerthon University Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Giovanni Battista Migliori. WHO Collaborating Centre for TB and Lung Diseases, Maugeri Care and Research Institute, Tradate, Italia.
TB Diagnostic Survey Working Group
World Health Organization - Italy · ITGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBHomerton University Hospital · GBHospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho · BRInstitut National d'Hygiène du Maroc · MAInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias · MXStellenbosch University · ZAUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the current use and potential acceptance (by tuberculosis experts worldwide) of novel rapid tests for the diagnosis of tuberculosis that are in line with World Health Organization target product profiles.

methodsA multilingual survey was disseminated online between July and November of 2016.

resultsA total of 723 individuals from 114 countries responded to the survey. Smear microscopy was the most commonly used rapid tuberculosis test (available to 90.9% of the respondents), followed by molecular assays (available to 70.7%). Only a small proportion of the respondents in middle- and low-income countries had access to interferon-gamma-release assays. Serological and lateral flow immunoassays were used by more than a quarter (25.4%) of the respondents. Among the respondents who had access to molecular tests, 46.7% were using the Xpert assay overall, that proportion being higher in lower middle-income countries (55.6%) and low-income countries (76.6%). The data also suggest that there was some alignment of pricing for molecular assays. Respondents stated they would accept novel rapid tuberculosis tests if available, including molecular assays (acceptable to 86.0%) or biomarker-based serological assays (acceptable to 81.7%). Simple biomarker-based assays were more commonly deemed acceptable in middle- and low-income countries.

conclusionsSecond-generation molecular assays have become more widely available in high- and low-resource settings. However, the development of novel rapid tuberculosis tests continues to be considered important by tuberculosis experts. Our data also underscore the need for additional training and education of end users.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelMycobacterium tuberculosisAdultFemaleGlobal HealthHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedReagent Kits, DiagnosticSensitivity and SpecificityTuberculosisYoung AdultReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID29160384
PMCPMC5790656
OpenAlexW2767928474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.