Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29160186›Full record

SynthesisPublic health nutrition2018

The impact of urban gardens on adequate and healthy food: a systematic review.

Mariana T Garcia, Silvana M Ribeiro, Ana Claudia Camargo Gonçalves Germani, Cláudia M Bógus

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Public health nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Practical Application of Ethical Research Principles: Developing and Implementing Grassroots Food Security Research With the Yarrabah Aboriginal Community.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Urban Nutrition in the Global South: A Narrative Review of Current Research.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mariana T Garcia1Department of Public Health Practice,School of Public Health,University of São Paulo,Av. Dr Arnaldo 715,Room 7,CEP 01246-904,São Paulo,SP,Brazil.
Silvana M Ribeiro1Department of Public Health Practice,School of Public Health,University of São Paulo,Av. Dr Arnaldo 715,Room 7,CEP 01246-904,São Paulo,SP,Brazil.
Ana Claudia Camargo Gonçalves Germani2Department of Preventive Medicine,University of São Paulo Medical School,São Paulo,SP,Brazil.
Cláudia M Bógus1Department of Public Health Practice,School of Public Health,University of São Paulo,Av. Dr Arnaldo 715,Room 7,CEP 01246-904,São Paulo,SP,Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the impacts on food and nutrition-related outcomes resulting from participation in urban gardens, especially on healthy food practices, healthy food access, and healthy food beliefs, knowledge and attitudes.

designThe systematic review identified studies by searching the PubMed, ERIC, LILACS, Web of Science and Embase databases. An assessment of quality and bias risk of the studies was carried out and a narrative summary was produced.

settingStudies published as original articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals in English, Spanish or Portuguese between 2005 and 2015 were included. SUBJECTS: The studies included were based on data from adult participants in urban gardens.

resultsTwenty-four studies were initially selected based on the eligibility criteria, twelve of which were included. There was important heterogeneity of settings, population and assessment methods. Assessment of quality and bias risk of the studies revealed the need for greater methodological rigour. Most studies investigated community gardens and employed a qualitative approach. The following were reported: greater fruit and vegetable consumption, better access to healthy foods, greater valuing of cooking, harvest sharing with family and friends, enhanced importance of organic production, and valuing of adequate and healthy food.

conclusionsThematic patterns related to adequate and healthy food associated with participation in urban gardens were identified, revealing a positive impact on practices of adequate and healthy food and mainly on food perceptions.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyGardensHealth PromotionUrban PopulationDatabases, FactualFruitGardeningHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicObservational Studies as TopicVegetablesAdultAgeAttitude to healthFood habitsGardening

Identifiers

PMID29160186
PMCPMC10260856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.