Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29159790›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2018

Vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy-a survey of compliance with recommendations.

C M Windrim, D A Crosby, K Mitchell, C Brophy, R Mahony, M Higgins

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Determinants of Vitamin D Supplementation among Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  6. The Role of Vitamin D in Fertility and during Pregnancy and Lactation: A Review of Clinical Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C M WindrimObstetrics and Gynaecology, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin, Holles St, Dublin 2, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7228-4100
D A CrosbyObstetrics and Gynaecology, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin, Holles St, Dublin 2, Ireland.
K MitchellNational Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
C BrophyMidwifery, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
R MahonyObstetrics and Gynaecology, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin, Holles St, Dublin 2, Ireland.
M HigginsObstetrics and Gynaecology, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin, Holles St, Dublin 2, Ireland. mary.higgins@ucd.ie.
University College Dublin · IENational Maternity Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVitamin D deficiency in pregnancy has important maternal and fetal implications, with increased risk of developing gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, preterm birth and small for gestational age birthweight. It is recommended that every pregnant woman should take 5 μg (200 IU) of vitamin D per day during pregnancy and lactation.

aimsThis study aimed to determine the prevalence of women taking vitamin D supplementation and to identify the reasons for patients not taking supplementation within women attending an antenatal clinic in Dublin.

methodsSurvey of women attending the antenatal clinic of the National Maternity Hospital Dublin during 2 weeks in January 2017. Women were asked to record demographics, medical comorbidities and use of vitamin D supplementation or any other supplements in pregnancy, as well as reasons for non-use if appropriate.

resultsThree hundred women were invited to participate and 175 completed the questionnaire (58%). Overall, 38.9% (n = 68) reported to be taking vitamin D supplementation. Of the women that reported not to be taking vitamin D supplementation, 57.9% (n = 62) were taking a pregnancy multivitamin that contained vitamin D, and 28.0% (n = 30) did not know that it was recommended in pregnancy. Therefore, a total of 45 women (25.7%) in our cohort were taking no vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy. There was no difference in non-use based on maternal age, BMI, parity, or country of origin.

conclusionsOf the women surveyed, 74.3% reported supplementation with vitamin D, either knowingly or unknowingly. Public health initiatives need to utilize this relatively safe, low-cost intervention to maximize maternal and fetal health. This could reduce the rates of antenatal conditions with associated high morbidity and healthcare burden such as gestational diabetes and preeclampsia.

Indexed as

AdultDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansPatient CompliancePregnancyPrenatal CareSurveys and QuestionnairesVitamin DVitamin DAntenatal careNutritionPregnancySupplementationVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID29159790
OpenAlexW2770911623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.