Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29159783›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2019

In Vitro Study of the Effects of Denosumab on Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Comparison with Zoledronic Acid.

Isao Shibuya, Masamichi Takami, Arei Miyamoto, Akiko Karakawa, Akira Dezawa, Shigeru Nakamura, Ryutaro Kamijo

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Denosumab Induces Neoplastic Stromal Cell ApoptosisCurrent cancer drug targets · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Isao ShibuyaDepartment of Biochemistry, Showa University School of Dentistry, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8555, Japan. ishibu@med.teikyo-u.ac.jp.
Masamichi TakamiDepartment of Pharmacology, Showa University School of Dentistry, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8555, Japan. takami@dent.shwa-u.ac.jp.
Arei MiyamotoDepartment of Biochemistry, Showa University School of Dentistry, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8555, Japan.
Akiko KarakawaDepartment of Pharmacology, Showa University School of Dentistry, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8555, Japan.
Akira DezawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University Mizonokuchi Hospital, 3-8-3 Mizonokuchi, Takatsu-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 213-8507, Japan.
Shigeru NakamuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University Mizonokuchi Hospital, 3-8-3 Mizonokuchi, Takatsu-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 213-8507, Japan.
Ryutaro KamijoDepartment of Biochemistry, Showa University School of Dentistry, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8555, Japan.
Showa University · JPTeikyo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive primary bone tumor that contains numerous osteoclasts formed from marrow-derived precursors through receptor activator of nuclear factor κ-B ligand (RANKL), an osteoclast differentiation factor expressed in neoplastic cells of GCTB. Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting RANKL, has recently been used for the treatment of GCTB, and superior treatment effects have been reported. The aim of this work was to elucidate the mechanism of action of denosumab, and the differences between denosumab and zoledronic acid at the level of GCTB cells. We isolated GCTB cells from 3 patients and separated them into osteoclasts, osteoclast precursors and proliferating spindle-shaped stromal cells (the true neoplastic component), and examined the action of denosumab on differentiation, survival and bone resorption activity of osteoclasts. Denosumab and zoledronic acid inhibited osteoclast differentiation from mononuclear cells containing osteoclast precursors. Zoledronic acid inhibited osteoclast survival, whereas an inhibitory effect of denosumab on osteoclast survival was not observed. The inhibitory effect on bone resorption by both agents was confirmed in culture on dentin slices. Furthermore, zoledronic acid showed dose-dependent inhibition of cell growth of neoplastic cells whereas denosumab had no inhibitory effect on these cells. Denosumab has an inhibitory effect on osteoclast differentiation, but no inhibitory effects on survival of osteoclasts or growth of neoplastic cells in GCTBs.

Indexed as

AdultApoptosisBone Density Conservation AgentsBone NeoplasmsBone ResorptionCell ProliferationDenosumabGiant Cell Tumor of BoneHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMaleMiddle AgedOsteoclastsPrognosisTumor Cells, CulturedZoledronic AcidBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabZoledronic AcidBisphosphonateBone tumorDenosumabGiant cell tumor of boneOsteoclast

Identifiers

PMID29159783
OpenAlexW2770277977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.