Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29159777›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2018

Prognostic factors for survival in adult patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a decision-tree-based model.

Etienne Audureau, Anaïs Chivet, Renata Ursu, Robert Corns, Philippe Metellus, Georges Noel, Sonia Zouaoui, Jacques Guyotat, Pierre-Jean Le Reste, Thierry Faillot and 24 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Systemic Immune Correlates of Long-term Survival after Delta-24-RGD Based on the Therapeutic Adenovirus for Recurrent Glioblastoma Effect Trial (TARGET).Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Impact of body composition parameters, age, and tumor staging on gastric cancer prognosis.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors at 16 institutions in 2 countries.

Etienne AudureauPublic Health Department, Henri Mondor Teaching Hospital, Créteil, France.
Anaïs ChivetDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris, France.
Renata UrsuDepartment of Neurology, Avicenne Hospital, AP-HP, Bobigny, France.
Robert CornsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Philippe MetellusDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clairval Private Hospital, Marseille, France.
Georges NoelDepartment of Radiotherapy, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France.
Sonia ZouaouiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Jacques GuyotatService of Neurosurgery D, Lyon Civil Hospitals, Pierre Wertheimer Neurological and Neurosurgical Hospital, Lyon, France.
Pierre-Jean Le ResteDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Pontchaillou, Rennes, France.
Thierry FaillotDepartment of Neurosurgery, APHP Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France.
Fabien LitreDepartment of Neurosurgery, Maison Blanche Hospital, Reims University Hospital, Reims, France.
Nicolas DesseDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sainte Anne Military Teaching Hospital, Toulon, France.
Antoine PetitDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France.
Evelyne EmeryDepartement of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Caen, University of Lower Normandy, Caen, France.
Emmanuelle Lechapt-ZalcmanDepartment of Pathology, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France.
Johann PeltierDepartment of Neurosurgery, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Julien DuntzeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Maison Blanche Hospital, Reims University Hospital, Reims, France.
Edouard DezamisPublic Health Department, Henri Mondor Teaching Hospital, Créteil, France.
Jimmy VoirinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Pasteur Hospital, Colmar, France.
Philippe MeneiDepartment of Neurosurgery, CHU d'Angers, Angers, France.
François CaireService de Neurochirurgie, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France.
Phong Dam HieuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Centre, University of Brest, Brest, France.
Jean-Luc BaratDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Olivier LangloisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Jean-Rodolphe VignesService de Neurochirurgie A, CHU Pellegrin, Bordeaux Cedex, France.
Pascale Fabbro-PerayDepartment of Biostatistique, Epidémiologie clinique, Santé Publique, Informations Médicales, University Hospital of Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
Adeline RiondelDepartment of Biostatistique, Epidémiologie clinique, Santé Publique, Informations Médicales, University Hospital of Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
Elodie SorbetsDepartment of Biostatistique, Epidémiologie clinique, Santé Publique, Informations Médicales, University Hospital of Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
Marc ZanelloPublic Health Department, Henri Mondor Teaching Hospital, Créteil, France.
Alexandre RouxPublic Health Department, Henri Mondor Teaching Hospital, Créteil, France.
Antoine CarpentierDepartment of Neurology, Avicenne Hospital, AP-HP, Bobigny, France.
Luc BauchetDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Johan PalludDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris, France. johanpallud@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1652-9844
Club de Neuro-Oncologie of the Société Française de Neurochirurgie
Délégation Paris 5 · FRLeeds General Infirmary · GBUniversité Paris-Est Créteil · FRInserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHôpital Beaujon · FRHôpital Pellegrin · FRUniversité de Nîmes · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRHôpital Pierre Wertheimer · FRUniversité de Bretagne Occidentale · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We assessed prognostic factors in relation to OS from progression in recurrent glioblastomas. Retrospective multicentric study enrolling 407 (training set) and 370 (external validation set) adult patients with a recurrent supratentorial glioblastoma treated by surgical resection and standard combined chemoradiotherapy as first-line treatment. Four complementary multivariate prognostic models were evaluated: Cox proportional hazards regression modeling, single-tree recursive partitioning, random survival forest, conditional random forest. Median overall survival from progression was 7.6 months (mean, 10.1; range, 0-86) and 8.0 months (mean, 8.5; range, 0-56) in the training and validation sets, respectively (p = 0.900). Using the Cox model in the training set, independent predictors of poorer overall survival from progression included increasing age at histopathological diagnosis (aHR, 1.47; 95% CI [1.03-2.08]; p = 0.032), RTOG-RPA V-VI classes (aHR, 1.38; 95% CI [1.11-1.73]; p = 0.004), decreasing KPS at progression (aHR, 3.46; 95% CI [2.10-5.72]; p < 0.001), while independent predictors of longer overall survival from progression included surgical resection (aHR, 0.57; 95% CI [0.44-0.73]; p < 0.001) and chemotherapy (aHR, 0.41; 95% CI [0.31-0.55]; p < 0.001). Single-tree recursive partitioning identified KPS at progression, surgical resection at progression, chemotherapy at progression, and RTOG-RPA class at histopathological diagnosis, as main survival predictors in the training set, yielding four risk categories highly predictive of overall survival from progression both in training (p < 0.0001) and validation (p < 0.0001) sets. Both random forest approaches identified KPS at progression as the most important survival predictor. Age, KPS at progression, RTOG-RPA classes, surgical resection at progression and chemotherapy at progression are prognostic for survival in recurrent glioblastomas and should inform the treatment decisions.

Indexed as

AgedBrain NeoplasmsDecision TreesDisease ProgressionFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesConditional random forestCox modelDecision treeGlioblastomaKarnofsky performance statusOverall survivalPrognostic modelsRandom survival forestRecurrenceRecursive partitioning analysisSurgery

Identifiers

PMID29159777
OpenAlexW2769014061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.