ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2018
Effects of Population Variability on Knee Loading During Simulated Human Gait.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Statistical-Shape Prediction of Lower Limb Kinematics During Cycling, Squatting, Lunging, and Stepping-Are Bone Geometry Predictors Helpful?Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cadaveric simulation models allow researchers to study native tissues in situ. However, as tests are conducted using donor specimens with unmatched kinematics, techniques that impose population average motions are subject to deviation from true physiologic conditions. This study aimed to identify factors which explain the kinetic variability observed during robotic simulations of a single human gait motion using a sample of human cadaver knees. Twelve human cadaver limbs (58 ± 16 years) were subjected to tibiofemoral geometrical analysis and cyclical stiffness testing in each anatomical degree of freedom. A simulated gait motion was then applied to each specimen. Resulting kinetics, specimen geometries, and various representations of tissue stiffness were reduced to functional attributes using principal component analysis and fit to a generalized linear prediction model. The capacity of knee topography to generate force was the largest contributor to kinetic variation in compression. Overall joint size, femoral notch height, translational laxity, and ad/abduction stiffness significantly contributed to kinetic variation in medial/lateral and anterior/posterior forces and associated torques. Future studies will investigate customizing kinematic paths to better simulate native conditions and reduce sampling variation, improving biomechanical test methods and evaluation strategies for future orthopedic techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.