ArticleMycopathologia2018
Opinion: Paracoccidioidomycosis and HIV Immune Recovery Inflammatory Syndrome.
Article in Mycopathologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Paracoccidioidomycosis in people living with HIV/AIDS: A historical retrospective cohort study in a national reference center for infectious diseases, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Article
- Sporotrichosis In Immunocompromised Hosts.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two distinct patterns of immune recovery inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) are recognized, paradoxical and unmasking IRIS. Here we raise some concerns regarding the first case of neuroPCM-IRIS published to date, as recently proposed by Almeida and Roza (Mycopathologia 177:137-141, 2017) for a patient originally described by Silva-Vergara et al. (Mycopathologia 182:393-396, 2014), taking in account the different case definitions for IRIS and the cases of neuroparacoccidioidomycosis already described in the literature. We are concerned that data from the case report have been misinterpreted and that no regard has been given to the possibility that the development of manifestations of neuroPCM after starting antiretroviral therapy and antifungal treatments could represent the predicted course of a missed neuroPCM diagnosis at presentation whose treatment failed. We hypothesize that diagnosis of the neuroPCM would not have been missed if careful screening for opportunistic infection of the central nervous system was performed prior to antiretroviral therapy initiation. Currently, there is no definitive diagnostic test for IRIS and diagnostic suspicion, as well as its management, are based on image studies and non-specific clinical signs and symptoms of inflammation. IRIS remains a diagnosis of exclusion, after considering drug toxicity, microbiologic treatment failure and the expected course of newly or previously diagnosed opportunistic infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.