Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29159410›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2018

Use of Health Care Databases to Support Supplemental Indications of Approved Medications.

Michael Fralick, Aaron S Kesselheim, Jerry Avorn, Sebastian Schneeweiss

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04212390 (Personalized Medicine Program on Myelodysplastic Syndromes), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
63.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04212390 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Personalized Medicine Program on Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Characterization of the Patient's Genome for Clinical Decision Making and Systematic Collection of Real World Data to Improve Quality of Health Care

TypeobservationalSponsorFondazione Italiana Sindromi Mielodisplastiche-ETSRan2020 to 2024Enrolled1,000ConditionsMDS (Myelodysplastic Syndrome)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fracture Risk After Initiation of Use of Canagliflozin: A Cohort Study.Annals of internal medicine · 2019 · on this map
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. An open-source implementation of tree-based scan statistics.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2024
    Article
  15. Long-term health outcomes for patients with obstructive sleep apnea: placing the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality report in context-a multisociety commentary.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael FralickDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Aaron S KesselheimDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jerry AvornDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sebastian SchneeweissDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Manufacturers of US Food and Drug Administration-approved prescription drugs often apply for additional indications based on randomized clinical trials. Real-world database analyses on a medication's use and outcomes in routine settings of care might help to inform decision making regarding such supplemental indications. Objective: To examine whether longitudinal data from a health care database can support the results of a randomized clinical trial that led to a supplemental indication for telmisartan. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study of patients newly prescribed telmisartan or ramipril used insurance claims data from a nationwide health care database from January 1, 2003, through September 30, 2009, to compare patient outcomes. This study replicated the inclusion and exclusion criteria used in the Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global End-point Trial (ONTARGET) and used propensity score matching to balance 74 patient characteristics. Data analysis was performed from February 15, 2017, to May 24, 2017. Exposures: Telmisartan use vs ramipril use. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for congestive heart failure. Results: Of the 640 951 patients included in the study, 48 053 were newly prescribed ramipril (mean [SD] age, 68.29 [9.52] years; 31 940 male [66.5%]) and 4665 were newly prescribed telmisartan (mean [SD] age, 69.43 [9.60] years; 2413 male [51.7%]). After propensity score matching, a total of 4665 patients were newly prescribed telmisartan (mean [SD] age, 69.43 [9.60] years; 2413 [51.7%]), and 4665 patients were newly prescribed ramipril (mean [SD] age, 69.36 [9.67] years; 2343 male [50.2%]). As seen in ONTARGET, the composite risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and hospitalization for congestive heart failure was similar for the 2 medications (hazard ratio, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.9-1.1). In addition, the study found that telmisartan was associated with a substantially decreased risk of angioedema (hazard ratio, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.03-0.56) compared with ramipril. Conclusions and Relevance: Real-world data analyses of patients receiving routine care provided findings similar to those found in the randomized clinical trial that established telmisartan's supplemental indication. In certain situations, database studies may support supplemental applications for effectiveness for already approved medications.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersCardiovascular DiseasesClinical Trials as TopicDelivery of Health CareDrug PrescriptionsFollow-Up StudiesHumansRamiprilRetrospective StudiesTelmisartanUnited StatesAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersRamiprilTelmisartan

Identifiers

PMID29159410
PMCPMC5833514
OpenAlexW2768945936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.