Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29159190›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2017

Divergent neural responses to narrative speech in disorders of consciousness.

Ivan Iotzov, Brian C Fidali, Agustin Petroni, Mary M Conte, Nicholas D Schiff, Lucas C Parra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Electrophysiological correlates of thalamocortical function in acute severe traumatic brain injury.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ivan IotzovCity College of New York New York New York.
Brian C FidaliLaboratory of Cognitive Neuromodulation The Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York.
Agustin PetroniCity College of New York New York New York.
Mary M ConteLaboratory of Cognitive Neuromodulation The Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York.
Nicholas D SchiffLaboratory of Cognitive Neuromodulation The Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York.
Lucas C ParraCity College of New York New York New York.

Funding

Disparities in COVID Disease Severity and Outcomes in New York CityUL1TR002384 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JULIANNE L IMPERATO-MCGINLEY · 2017 to 2026
$86.2M
J. NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002386 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Genevieve Giny Fouda Amou ou · 2017 to 2026
$5.8M
Mechanisms of recovery following severe brain injuryR01HD051912 · NICHD · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI SCHIFF, NICHOLAS D · 2008 to 2012
$2.1M
Clinical and Translational Science CenterTL1TR000459 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI IMPERATO-MCGINLEY, JULIANNE L · 2012 to 2016
$451k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000459NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002386NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002384NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD051912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Clinical assessment of auditory attention in patients with disorders of consciousness is often limited by motor impairment. Here, we employ intersubject correlations among electroencephalography responses to naturalistic speech in order to assay auditory attention among patients and healthy controls. Methods: Electroencephalographic data were recorded from 20 subjects with disorders of consciousness and 14 healthy controls during of two narrative audio stimuli, presented both forwards and time-reversed. Intersubject correlation of evoked electroencephalography signals were calculated, comparing responses of both groups to those of the healthy control subjects. This analysis was performed blinded and subsequently compared to the diagnostic status of each patient based on the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised. Results: Subjects with disorders of consciousness exhibit significantly lower intersubject correlation than healthy controls during narrative speech. Additionally, while healthy subjects had higher intersubject correlation values in forwards versus backwards presentation, neural responses did not vary significantly with the direction of playback in subjects with disorders of consciousness. Increased intersubject correlation values in the backward speech condition were noted with improving disorder of consciousness diagnosis, both in cross-sectional analysis and in a subset of patients with longitudinal data. Interpretation: Intersubject correlation of neural responses to narrative speech audition differentiates healthy controls from patients and appears to index clinical diagnoses in disorders of consciousness.

Identifiers

PMID29159190
PMCPMC5682119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.