Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29159139›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of laboratory medicine2017

Task-shifting point-of-care CD4+ testing to lay health workers in HIV care and treatment services in Namibia.

Francina Kaindjee-Tjituka, Souleymane Sawadogo, Graham Mutandi, Andrew D Maher, Natanael Salomo, Claudia Mbapaha, Marytha Neo, Anita Beukes, Justice Gweshe, Alexinah Muadinohamba and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of laboratory medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Managing Advanced HIV Disease in a Public Health Approach.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  16. Honing in on disease etiology.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Francina Kaindjee-TjitukaDirectorate of Special Programs, Ministry of Health and Social Services, Windhoek, Namibia.
Souleymane SawadogoUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Windhoek, Namibia.ORCID 0000-0002-4206-4454
Graham MutandiUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Windhoek, Namibia.
Andrew D MaherUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Windhoek, Namibia.
Natanael SalomoUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Windhoek, Namibia.
Claudia MbapahaUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Windhoek, Namibia.
Marytha NeoUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Windhoek, Namibia.
Anita BeukesUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Windhoek, Namibia.
Justice GwesheDirectorate of Special Programs, Ministry of Health and Social Services, Windhoek, Namibia.
Alexinah MuadinohambaDirectorate of Special Programs, Ministry of Health and Social Services, Windhoek, Namibia.
David W LowranceDirectorate of Special Programs, Ministry of Health and Social Services, Windhoek, Namibia.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · UGMinistry of Health and Social Services · NA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAccess to CD4+ testing remains a common barrier to early initiation of antiretroviral therapy among persons living with HIV/AIDS in low- and middle-income countries. The feasibility of task-shifting of point-of-care (POC) CD4+ testing to lay health workers in Namibia has not been evaluated.

methodsFrom July to August 2011, Pima CD4+ analysers were used to improve access to CD4+ testing at 10 selected public health facilities in Namibia. POC Pima CD4+ testing was performed by nurses or lay health workers. Venous blood samples were collected from 10% of patients and sent to centralised laboratories for CD4+ testing with standard methods. Outcomes for POC Pima CD4+ testing and patient receipt of results were compared between nurses and lay health workers and between the POC method and standard laboratory CD4+ testing methods.

resultsOverall, 1429 patients received a Pima CD4+ test; 500 (35.0%) tests were performed by nurses and 929 (65.0%) were performed by lay health workers. When Pima CD4+ testing was performed by a nurse or a lay health worker, 93.2% and 95.2% of results were valid (

conclusionsPOC CD4+ testing was feasible and effective when task-shifted to lay health workers. Rollout of POC CD4+ testing via task-shifting can improve access to CD4+ testing and retention in care between HIV diagnosis and antiretroviral therapy initiation in low- and middle-income countries.

Identifiers

PMID29159139
PMCPMC5684646
OpenAlexW2755366847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.