Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29158912›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2017

A phase 2 quasi-experimental trial evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness of complex nursing intervention focused on QoL assessment on advanced cancer patients with palliative care needs: study protocol.

Gianluca Catania, Annamaria Bagnasco, Alessio Signori, Paola Pilastri, Marta Bottino, Claudia Cervetti, Milko Zanini, Giuseppe Aleo, Loredana Sasso

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Palliative Care Models for Cancer Patients: Learning for Planning in Nursing (Review).Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gianluca CataniaDepartment of Health Sciences, School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Genova, Via Pastore 1, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0862-071X
Annamaria BagnascoDepartment of Health Sciences, School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Genova, Via Pastore 1, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Alessio SignoriDepartment of Health Sciences, School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Genova, Via Pastore 1, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Paola PilastriDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Largo R. Benzi 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Marta BottinoHospice Unit, Gigi Ghirotti not-for-profit association, Corso Europa 50, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Claudia CervettiHospice Unit, Gigi Ghirotti not-for-profit association, Corso Europa 50, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Milko ZaniniDepartment of Health Sciences, School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Genova, Via Pastore 1, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Giuseppe AleoDepartment of Health Sciences, School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Genova, Via Pastore 1, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Loredana SassoDepartment of Health Sciences, School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Genova, Via Pastore 1, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
University of Genoa · ITHospice UK · GBOspedale Policlinico San Martino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPalliative care (PC) is an approach that improves the quality of life (QoL) of patients and their families facing the problem associated with incurable terminal disease. A number of QoL assessment tools have been validated in PC and their use described for research purposes, to support clinical practice, and as part of the quality improvement programs. There is a paucity of evidence on the implementation of a nursing intervention focused on QoL assessment in PC practice.The aim of this study is to model and determine the feasibility of a nursing complex intervention focused on QoL assessment in PC practice.

methodsThe intervention will be evaluated through a quasi-experimental non-equivalent comparison group before-after study design. This project can be classified as phases 1-2, according to the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions.The study setting will take place in two inpatient hospice units in Italy. The study sample will be constituted of 39 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals and a sample of 46 advanced cancer patients admitted to hospices during the implementation of the intervention. DISCUSSION: This study will generate information to address the implementation of QoL measurement in palliative care practice. Findings of this study will be used to inform a phase 3 trial according to the MRC framework.

trial registrationISRCTN41201864 retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Cancer patientComplex interventionDevelopmentImplementationNurse-led interventionNursing-sensitive patient outcomesOutcome assessmentOutcome measurementPalliative carePatient-centered outcome measurePatient-reported outcome measureQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID29158912
PMCPMC5683557
OpenAlexW2770777757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.