Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29158849›Full record

ArticleTheranostics2017

Enhanced antitumor efficacy of biocompatible magnetosomes for the magnetic hyperthermia treatment of glioblastoma.

Raphaël Le Fèvre, Mickaël Durand-Dubief, Imène Chebbi, Chalani Mandawala, France Lagroix, Jean-Pierre Valet, Ahmed Idbaih, Clovis Adam, Jean-Yves Delattre, Charlotte Schmitt and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theranostics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Magnetic Hyperthermia in Glioblastoma Multiforme Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Neurosurgical Applications of Magnetic Hyperthermia Therapy.Neurosurgery clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Raphaël Le FèvreNanobacterie SARL, 36 boulevard Flandrin, 75016, Paris.
Mickaël Durand-DubiefNanobacterie SARL, 36 boulevard Flandrin, 75016, Paris.
Imène ChebbiNanobacterie SARL, 36 boulevard Flandrin, 75016, Paris.
Chalani MandawalaNanobacterie SARL, 36 boulevard Flandrin, 75016, Paris.
France LagroixInstitut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Univ. Paris Diderot, UMR 7154 CNRS, 1 rue Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France.
Jean-Pierre ValetInstitut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Univ. Paris Diderot, UMR 7154 CNRS, 1 rue Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France.
Ahmed IdbaihInserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC, University Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, F-75013, Paris, France. AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, F-75013, Paris, France.
Clovis AdamLaboratoire de neuropathologie, GHU Paris-Sud-Hôpital Bicêtre, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, 94270 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.
Jean-Yves DelattreInserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC, University Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, F-75013, Paris, France. AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, F-75013, Paris, France.
Charlotte SchmittInserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC, University Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, F-75013, Paris, France. AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, F-75013, Paris, France.
Caroline MaakeInstitute of Anatomy, UZH University of Zurich, Instiute of Anatomy, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
François GuyotInstitut de minéralogie de physique des matériaux et de cosmochimie, Sorbonne Université UMR 7590 CNRS, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Muséum Naitonal d'Histoire Naturelle. 4 Place Jussieu, 75005, Paris, France.
Edouard AlphandéryNanobacterie SARL, 36 boulevard Flandrin, 75016, Paris.
Institut de minéralogie, de physique des matériaux et de cosmochimie · FRInstitut du Cerveau · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, biologically synthesized iron oxide nanoparticles, called magnetosomes, are made fully biocompatible by removing potentially toxic organic bacterial residues such as endotoxins at magnetosome mineral core surfaces and by coating such surface with poly-L-lysine, leading to magnetosomes-poly-L-lysine (M-PLL). M-PLL antitumor efficacy is compared with that of chemically synthesized iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) currently used for magnetic hyperthermia. M-PLL and IONPs are tested for the treatment of glioblastoma, a dreadful cancer, in which intratumor nanoparticle administration is clinically relevant, using a mouse allograft model of murine glioma (GL-261 cell line). A magnetic hyperthermia treatment protocol is proposed, in which 25 µg in iron of nanoparticles per mm

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorFemaleGlioblastomaGliomaHyperthermia, InducedMagnetic FieldsMagnetosomesMiceNanomedicineNanoparticlesalternating magnetic fieldGlioblastomamagnetic hyperthermiamagnetosomesmagnetotactic bacteriananomedicine

Identifiers

PMID29158849
PMCPMC5695153
OpenAlexW2765924646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.