Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29158641›Full record

ArticlePhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology2017

Development of an efficient and reproducible regeneration system in wheat (

Rakesh Kumar, Harohalli Masthigowda Mamrutha, Amandeep Kaur, Karnam Venkatesh, Anita Grewal, Raj Kumar, Vinod Tiwari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rakesh KumarBiotechnology Engineering, University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, Haryana 136119 India.
Harohalli Masthigowda MamruthaICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research (IIWBR), Karnal, Haryana 132001 India.
Amandeep KaurBiotechnology Engineering, University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, Haryana 136119 India.
Karnam VenkateshICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research (IIWBR), Karnal, Haryana 132001 India.
Anita GrewalBiotechnology Engineering, University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, Haryana 136119 India.
Raj KumarICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research (IIWBR), Karnal, Haryana 132001 India.
Vinod TiwariICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research (IIWBR), Karnal, Haryana 132001 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of reproducible regeneration system through tissue culture is a major bottleneck in wheat improvement program. The present study has considered to develop an efficient callus induction and regeneration system using mature and immature embryos as explants in recently released agronomically superior spring wheat varieties. An efficient sterilization process was standardized using 0.1% HgCl

Indexed as

2,4-DDicambaMature/immature embryosPicloramRegenerationTriticum aestivumZeatin

Identifiers

PMID29158641
PMCPMC5671445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.