Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29158606›Full record

ArticleNature microbiology2018

Detecting macroecological patterns in bacterial communities across independent studies of global soils.

Kelly S Ramirez, Christopher G Knight, Mattias de Hollander, Francis Q Brearley, Bede Constantinides, Anne Cotton, Si Creer, Thomas W Crowther, John Davison, Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo and 26 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Towards an integrative understanding of soil biodiversity.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Enumerating soil biodiversity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Kelly S RamirezNetherlands Institute of Ecology, Wageningen, The Netherlands. k.ramirez@nioo.knaw.nl.
Christopher G KnightFaculty of Science and Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Mattias de HollanderNetherlands Institute of Ecology, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Francis Q BrearleySchool of Science and the Environment, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Bede ConstantinidesEvolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Anne CottonDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Si CreerEnvironment Centre Wales, College of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Thomas W CrowtherNetherlands Institute of Ecology, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
John DavisonDepartment of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Manuel Delgado-BaquerizoCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
Ellen DorrepaalClimate Impacts Research Centre, Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, Abisko, Sweden.
David R ElliottSchool of Science and the Environment, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Graeme FoxSchool of Science and the Environment, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Robert I GriffithsCentre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.
Chris HaleSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Kyle HartmanDivision of Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Zürich, Switzerland.
Ashley HouldenFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
David L JonesEnvironment Centre Wales, College of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Eveline J KrabClimate Impacts Research Centre, Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, Abisko, Sweden.
Fernando T MaestreDepartamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, Escuela Superior de Ciencias Experimentales y Tecnología, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Spain.
Krista L McGuireDepartment of Biology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Sylvain MonteuxClimate Impacts Research Centre, Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, Abisko, Sweden.
Caroline H OrrSchool of Science and Engineering, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Wim H van der PuttenNetherlands Institute of Ecology, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Ian S RobertsFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
David A RobinsonCentre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bangor, UK.
Jennifer D RoccaDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Jennifer RowntreeSchool of Science and the Environment, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Klaus SchlaeppiDivision of Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Zürich, Switzerland.
Matthew ShepherdNatural England, Exeter, UK.
Brajesh K SinghHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
Angela L StraathofFaculty of Science and Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jennifer M BhatnagarDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Cécile ThionInstitute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Marcel G A van der HeijdenDivision of Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Zürich, Switzerland.
Franciska T de VriesFaculty of Science and Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G1100076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of high-throughput DNA sequencing methods provides unprecedented opportunities to further unravel bacterial biodiversity and its worldwide role from human health to ecosystem functioning. However, despite the abundance of sequencing studies, combining data from multiple individual studies to address macroecological questions of bacterial diversity remains methodically challenging and plagued with biases. Here, using a machine-learning approach that accounts for differences among studies and complex interactions among taxa, we merge 30 independent bacterial data sets comprising 1,998 soil samples from 21 countries. Whereas previous meta-analysis efforts have focused on bacterial diversity measures or abundances of major taxa, we show that disparate amplicon sequence data can be combined at the taxonomy-based level to assess bacterial community structure. We find that rarer taxa are more important for structuring soil communities than abundant taxa, and that these rarer taxa are better predictors of community structure than environmental factors, which are often confounded across studies. We conclude that combining data from independent studies can be used to explore bacterial community dynamics, identify potential 'indicator' taxa with an important role in structuring communities, and propose hypotheses on the factors that shape bacterial biogeography that have been overlooked in the past.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaEcologyMicrobiotaSoil MicrobiologyBacteriaBiodiversityDNA, BacterialEcosystemHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMachine LearningMicrobial InteractionsPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.