ReviewJournal of human genetics2018
Application of genome editing technologies in rats for human disease models.
Review in Journal of human genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- In vivo fertilization improved the cryotolerance and developmental ability of vitrified-warmed rat fertilized oocytes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Stimuli-responsive nanoformulations for CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2022Review
- Application of CRISPR/Cas9 System in Establishing Large Animal Models.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Modification of improved-genome editing via oviductal nucleic acids delivery (i-GONAD)-mediated knock-in in rats.BMC biotechnology · 2021Article
- Creation of X-linked Alport syndrome rat model with Col4a5 deficiency.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Successful production of genome-edited rats by the rGONAD method.BMC biotechnology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laboratory rats and mice are representative experimental animals for models of human disease. The emergence of genome editing technologies has enabled us to produce a variety of genetically modified animals, including rats, as a means of elucidating the in vivo functions of the gene of interest and characterizing the molecular mechanisms of human disease. Several advanced techniques for knock-in methodologies in rats are currently in development, which permit researchers to introduce precise nucleotide modifications at target sites in the rat's genome. Furthermore, recent studies with knock-out rats have revealed that observed disease phenotypes are often more similar than mouse models to those of humans. In this article, we introduce the methodologies for efficient gene manipulation in rats using genome editing technologies, and describe the advances made using rats for human disease models. We also discuss the importance of gene manipulation in animal models for the better understanding of fundamental processes among different species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.