Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29158551›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2017

The International Rare Diseases Research Consortium: Policies and Guidelines to maximize impact.

Hanns Lochmüller, Josep Torrent I Farnell, Yann Le Cam, Anneliene H Jonker, Lilian Pl Lau, Gareth Baynam, Petra Kaufmann, Hugh Js Dawkins, Paul Lasko, Christopher P Austin and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Maternal perspectives on sharing newborn genomic data.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. [Rare-disease data standards].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hanns LochmüllerInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK. Hanns.Lochmuller@newcastle.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2324-8001
Josep Torrent I FarnellAutonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Yann Le CamEURORDIS-Rare Diseases Europe, Paris, France.
Anneliene H JonkerIRDiRC Scientific Secretariat, Inserm US-14, Paris, France.
Lilian Pl LauIRDiRC Scientific Secretariat, Inserm US-14, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8407-3861
Gareth BaynamGenetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.
Petra KaufmannNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Hugh Js DawkinsOffice of Population Health Genomics, Public Health Division, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Paul LaskoDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4037-3501
Christopher P AustinNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kym M BoycottChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
IRDiRC Consortium Assembly

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The International Rare Diseases Research Consortium (IRDiRC) has agreed on IRDiRC Policies and Guidelines, following extensive deliberations and discussions in 2012 and 2013, as a first step towards improving coordination of research efforts worldwide. The 25 funding members and 3 patient umbrella organizations (as of early 2013) of IRDiRC, a consortium of research funders that focuses on improving diagnosis and therapy for rare disease patients, agreed in Dublin, Ireland in April 2013 on the Policies and Guidelines that emphasize collaboration in rare disease research, the involvement of patients and their representatives in all relevant aspects of research, as well as the sharing of data and resources. The Policies and Guidelines provide guidance on ontologies, diagnostics, biomarkers, patient registries, biobanks, natural history, therapeutics, models, publication, intellectual property, and communication. Most IRDiRC members-currently nearly 50 strong-have since incorporated its policies in their funding calls and some have chosen to exceed the requirements laid out, for instance in relation to data sharing. The IRDiRC Policies and Guidelines are the first, detailed agreement of major public and private funding organizations worldwide to govern rare disease research, and may serve as a template for other areas of international research collaboration. While it is too early to assess their full impact on research productivity and patient benefit, the IRDiRC Policies and Guidelines have already contributed significantly to improving transparency and collaboration in rare disease research.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicHuman GeneticsHumansInternational CooperationRare Diseases

Identifiers

PMID29158551
PMCPMC5865169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.