ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2018
Clinical utility of the Prostate Health Index (phi) for biopsy decision management in a large group urology practice setting.
Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical utility of the exosome based ExoDx Prostate(IntelliScore) EPI test in men presenting for initial Biopsy with a PSA 2-10 ng/mL.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2020Trial
- Changes in the Age Distribution of Radical Prostatectomy and Radical Cystectomy During the Diffusion of Robot-Assisted Surgery in Japan.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Comparing diagnostic prostate cancer biomarkers using a framework of clinically meaningful criteria.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Prostate Cancer Screening in Contemporary Era: PSA-Based Testing and Risk-Adapted Approaches.Cancers · 2026Review
- Combining Serum Prostate Health Index With Urinary PCA3 and TMPRSS2:ERG RNA Testing Improves Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.JU open plus · 2026Article
- Emerging tools for the early detection of prostate cancer.BJUI compass · 2025Review
- Molecular diagnostics of prostate cancer: impact of molecular tests.Asian journal of andrology · 2024Review
- Prostate Cancer: A Review of Genetics, Current Biomarkers and Personalised Treatments.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Review
- Review
- Clinical Biofluid Assays for Prostate Cancer.Cancers · 2023Review
- Recent advances and future perspectives in the therapeutics of prostate cancer.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2023Article
- Prostate health index (PHI) as an accurate prostate cancer predictor.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Observational
- Article
- Utility of Prostate-Specific Antigen Isoforms and Prostate Health Index in the Diagnosis of Metastatic Prostate Cancer.Journal of laboratory physicians · 2023Article
- Commentary on Novitas LCD.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Screening for prostate cancer: protocol for updating multiple systematic reviews to inform a Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care guideline update.Systematic reviews · 2022Article
- Volatilomics: An Emerging and Promising Avenue for the Detection of Potential Prostate Cancer Biomarkers.Cancers · 2022Review
- Liquid biomarkers for early detection of prostate cancer and summary of available data for their use in African-American men.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2022Review
- Development of a novel nomogram for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer with the prostate health index and multiparametric MRI.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Serum multi-cytokines screening identifies TRAIL and IL-10 as probable new biomarkers for prostate health index diagnostic utility adjustment in grey zone aggressive prostate cancer detection: A single-center data in China.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDeciding when to biopsy a man with non-suspicious DRE findings and tPSA in the 4-10 ng/ml range can be challenging, because two-thirds of such biopsies are typically found to be benign. The Prostate Health Index (phi) exhibits significantly improved diagnostic accuracy for prostate cancer detection when compared to tPSA and %fPSA, however only one published study to date has investigated its impact on biopsy decisions in clinical practice.
methodsAn IRB approved observational study was conducted at four large urology group practices using a physician reported two-part questionnaire. Physician recommendations were recorded before and after receiving the phi test result. A historical control group was queried from each site's electronic medical records for eligible men who were seen by the same participating urologists prior to the implementation of the phi test in their practice. 506 men receiving a phi test were prospectively enrolled and 683 men were identified for the historical control group (without phi). Biopsy and pathological findings were also recorded for both groups.
resultsMen receiving a phi test showed a significant reduction in biopsy procedures performed when compared to the historical control group (36.4% vs. 60.3%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Based on questionnaire responses, the phi score impacted the physician's patient management plan in 73% of cases, including biopsy deferrals when the phi score was low, and decisions to perform biopsies when the phi score indicated an intermediate or high probability of prostate cancer (phi ≥36).
conclusionsphi testing significantly impacted the physician's biopsy decision for men with tPSA in the 4-10 ng/ml range and non-suspicious DRE findings. Appropriate utilization of phi resulted in a significant reduction in biopsy procedures performed compared to historical patients seen by the same participating urologists who would have met enrollment eligibility but did not receive a phi test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.